Is it possible that this is a based dude trying to punish the system's use of trannies as cultural wrecking balls? He does to the canadian schools and govt what Sergeant Yiff Woof is doing to the military, everyone but chat bots and the heavily groomed can tell instinctively by sight that these things are disgusting & wrong.
I guess it's mental gymnastics for me to work out a theory where these guys are morally comprehensible to me, but the alternative drives me nuts. I mean how often have you talked face to face with someone who can't level with you on basics when it comes down to it? Like actual 2+2, up-is-up stuff? For me it is not often at all. I want to say never, but if I had a perfect memory, idk.
Obviously people cling to their personal convictions socially speaking, but when it gets real, face to face, there comes an implicit understanding of the separation between discussion, stance, emotion, moral posture, etc VS. physical reality itself. In a real life talk you can reach consensus on core the tranny question every time, BUT it will come with a BUT: muh stance, muh emotion, muh moral posture. At least at that juncture we understand that those are personal human complaints in the face of an unforgivingly objective physical reality, one that we know we agree exists.
The reason I bring that up is because this goes away totally when the person's exploits are famous on the internet and you can't and will never be able to take advantage of the candid and cooperative nature of an actual face to face discussion with them. If people aren't fighting in a discussion they are working toward some conclusion together. It's nature. The internet and celebrity culture massacre this beautifully evolved system. Strangers argue with each other and with bots about famous strangers and there is no game connection between anyone's text output and, well, anything. You can just type la di doe di dah and send without triggering practically any of the innumerable and precise social mechanisms that enabled formation of human societies in the first place.
The demands get ever more ridiculous. It reminds me of the South Park episode with Mr Garrison.
Is it possible that this is a based dude trying to punish the system's use of trannies as cultural wrecking balls? He does to the canadian schools and govt what Sergeant Yiff Woof is doing to the military, everyone but chat bots and the heavily groomed can tell instinctively by sight that these things are disgusting & wrong.
I guess it's mental gymnastics for me to work out a theory where these guys are morally comprehensible to me, but the alternative drives me nuts. I mean how often have you talked face to face with someone who can't level with you on basics when it comes down to it? Like actual 2+2, up-is-up stuff? For me it is not often at all. I want to say never, but if I had a perfect memory, idk.
Obviously people cling to their personal convictions socially speaking, but when it gets real, face to face, there comes an implicit understanding of the separation between discussion, stance, emotion, moral posture, etc VS. physical reality itself. In a real life talk you can reach consensus on core the tranny question every time, BUT it will come with a BUT: muh stance, muh emotion, muh moral posture. At least at that juncture we understand that those are personal human complaints in the face of an unforgivingly objective physical reality, one that we know we agree exists.
The reason I bring that up is because this goes away totally when the person's exploits are famous on the internet and you can't and will never be able to take advantage of the candid and cooperative nature of an actual face to face discussion with them. If people aren't fighting in a discussion they are working toward some conclusion together. It's nature. The internet and celebrity culture massacre this beautifully evolved system. Strangers argue with each other and with bots about famous strangers and there is no game connection between anyone's text output and, well, anything. You can just type la di doe di dah and send without triggering practically any of the innumerable and precise social mechanisms that enabled formation of human societies in the first place.