This is the problem I have with tradcons. Their end goal of intact nuclear families is a good one, but they're completely unprepared to talk about what it would take to make it a reality. The feminist rot has become so pervasive that fixing intergender relations and families is beyond the imagination of even most conservatives.
The answers are simple: Go back to the old ways of restraining female hypergamy so the average man doesn't give up on women by age 20 due to repeated failure. Stop allowing women to label anyone who approaches them as a predator if they don't find them attractive. Fix the rotten legal system that makes getting involved with women so dangerous. Everything from VAWA to bullshit restraining orders to loss of gun rights over red flag law/RO/DV abuse to the corrupt family courts that steal everything a man has ever worked for. Restore the responsibilities that women have in marriage and make them pay for their own bad decisions instead of enslaving men to do it.
Fix the anti-male system and the rest will solve itself. In the 1950's we didn't need Josh Hawley types to get men to take the deal they were offered. Men took the deal because for most of them it was a good deal. Now the deal has changed and men want nothing do with it. Maybe change the deal instead of expecting men to throw their lives away for the shitty deal currently on offer?
I'll happily talk about making it a reality. It involves abolishing democracy and establishing an expressly Christian state that outlaws the various trappings and outcomes of post modernism. It looks like putting 90% of college professors and judges to the gallows, because the legal and education system can't be reformed so long as they live. It looks like making unmarried women the effective property of the oldest man in their household. It looks like the expulsion of degenerate demographics of all variety.
But most of all it involves admitting the necessity of violence, because reform is not possible.
Sounds like a plan. Do we get to give feminists and their soy boy simps the same treatment we give the professors and judges? I'll volunteer as a hangman if the answer is yes.
This is the problem I have with tradcons. Their end goal of intact nuclear families is a good one, but they're completely unprepared to talk about what it would take to make it a reality. The feminist rot has become so pervasive that fixing intergender relations and families is beyond the imagination of even most conservatives.
The answers are simple: Go back to the old ways of restraining female hypergamy so the average man doesn't give up on women by age 20 due to repeated failure. Stop allowing women to label anyone who approaches them as a predator if they don't find them attractive. Fix the rotten legal system that makes getting involved with women so dangerous. Everything from VAWA to bullshit restraining orders to loss of gun rights over red flag law/RO/DV abuse to the corrupt family courts that steal everything a man has ever worked for. Restore the responsibilities that women have in marriage and make them pay for their own bad decisions instead of enslaving men to do it.
Fix the anti-male system and the rest will solve itself. In the 1950's we didn't need Josh Hawley types to get men to take the deal they were offered. Men took the deal because for most of them it was a good deal. Now the deal has changed and men want nothing do with it. Maybe change the deal instead of expecting men to throw their lives away for the shitty deal currently on offer?
I'll happily talk about making it a reality. It involves abolishing democracy and establishing an expressly Christian state that outlaws the various trappings and outcomes of post modernism. It looks like putting 90% of college professors and judges to the gallows, because the legal and education system can't be reformed so long as they live. It looks like making unmarried women the effective property of the oldest man in their household. It looks like the expulsion of degenerate demographics of all variety.
But most of all it involves admitting the necessity of violence, because reform is not possible.
Sounds like a plan. Do we get to give feminists and their soy boy simps the same treatment we give the professors and judges? I'll volunteer as a hangman if the answer is yes.
The implication is that the former would be dead and subjugated by the time we have sufficient control to take care of the latter.