You completely skipped over my response to this statement...
Now you're suddenly committed to responding to everything? That sure was not the case when inconvenient facts were pointed out to you.
You never answered my question, where's the longitudinal phase III data that shows that the vaccines are beneficial for old people?
This claim relies on the presumption that nothing can be beneficial without "longitudinal phase III data", which is stupid. It's Reddit-tier "can you provide a source for your claim that cutting off your dick is actually bad?"
Your list will need to be exactly equal and/or longer than this brief list showing symptomatic SAEs
Absolutely not. First of all, many of those have nothing at all to do with any vaccine harms, like the vaccine not halting the spread effectively. You're just padding your list with harms, many of which have absolutely nothing to do with older people. You just copy-pasted your usual 'COVID vaccine bad' list.
For example, this is about two myocarditis cases in 40-somethings. Now, I don't know if you are 13, but for the rest of the world, they do not count as 'older people'.
So what exactly does this prove for older people? Nothing. Did you even read the stuff that you post? In fact, as you no doubt know, the older you are, the less likely you are to get myocarditis from the vaccine.
And how is this equivalent proof to something actually germane to the topic, for example showing that the vaccine saved hundreds of thousands of older people?
Now you're suddenly committed to responding to everything? That sure was not the case when inconvenient facts were pointed out to you.
This claim relies on the presumption that nothing can be beneficial without "longitudinal phase III data", which is stupid. It's Reddit-tier "can you provide a source for your claim that cutting off your dick is actually bad?"
Absolutely not. First of all, many of those have nothing at all to do with any vaccine harms, like the vaccine not halting the spread effectively. You're just padding your list with harms, many of which have absolutely nothing to do with older people. You just copy-pasted your usual 'COVID vaccine bad' list.
For example, this is about two myocarditis cases in 40-somethings. Now, I don't know if you are 13, but for the rest of the world, they do not count as 'older people'.
So what exactly does this prove for older people? Nothing. Did you even read the stuff that you post? In fact, as you no doubt know, the older you are, the less likely you are to get myocarditis from the vaccine.
And how is this equivalent proof to something actually germane to the topic, for example showing that the vaccine saved hundreds of thousands of older people?
Concession noted.
Hah. I know you're trying to save face, but not replying would have been more effective in this case.
Did you convince even yourself?