jobless men don’t act the way advocates of “universal basic income” have always promised they would — becoming caregivers, volunteering in their communities or pursuing artistic passions. The evidence from time-use surveys all suggests pretty strongly that people freed from the responsibility of work sit on their asses all day, do drugs and play video games. Who knew, right?
Good. The idea that there's nobility in performing labor is completely preposterous when that labor is simply to make a multinational corporation and the billionaires that control it even richer while feeding a feminist-facist government that hates you.
People work to put food on the table; if they found a way to scam the system and get money without working, more power to them. Withdraw from soyciety and become ungovernable.
People work to put food on the table; if they found a way to scam the system and get money without working, more power to them. Withdraw from soyciety and become ungovernable.
That's fucking retarded.
You're not suggesting people become ungovernable, you're demanding people become worthless and unimportant. There's no difference between this and being a useless consoomer. To think you're ungovernable because no one gives a shit whether you live or die, being that you have no friends and have no social influence, is laughable at best.
Men need to be the pillar of the parallel societies they build around them out of their communities, friends, and families. They need to be bastions against the institutions and toxic incentives of a poisoned society. They need to be the arbiters of morality locally. They need to be the center piece around which they can build a community. They need to be the reliable force that can help others build wealth and influence.
This idea that you should withdraw from society is Leftist subversion from the fucking 70's, back in the days of "Tune in, drop out" mentality of the fucking hippies.
Many of the Hippies ran off to start communes where they could live outside mainstream society in actual socialism.
Only to have them all implode, because building community infrastructure from the ground up is hard, dirty work; and almost all of them were happy to sit on their ass and let everyone else do the work.
Even ten or twenty percent of the community being freeloaders is unsustainable at the subsistence level. The people who work the hardest see the freeloaders take their stuff, and they get cross. They leave, and it all falls in a heap.
Hippy Communes were a fantastic case study of why Socialism doesn't work without totalitarian control.
Good. The idea that there's nobility in performing labor is completely preposterous when that labor is simply to make a multinational corporation and the billionaires that control it even richer while feeding a feminist-facist government that hates you.
People work to put food on the table; if they found a way to scam the system and get money without working, more power to them. Withdraw from soyciety and become ungovernable.
That's fucking retarded.
You're not suggesting people become ungovernable, you're demanding people become worthless and unimportant. There's no difference between this and being a useless consoomer. To think you're ungovernable because no one gives a shit whether you live or die, being that you have no friends and have no social influence, is laughable at best.
Men need to be the pillar of the parallel societies they build around them out of their communities, friends, and families. They need to be bastions against the institutions and toxic incentives of a poisoned society. They need to be the arbiters of morality locally. They need to be the center piece around which they can build a community. They need to be the reliable force that can help others build wealth and influence.
This idea that you should withdraw from society is Leftist subversion from the fucking 70's, back in the days of "Tune in, drop out" mentality of the fucking hippies.
Many of the Hippies ran off to start communes where they could live outside mainstream society in actual socialism.
Only to have them all implode, because building community infrastructure from the ground up is hard, dirty work; and almost all of them were happy to sit on their ass and let everyone else do the work.
Even ten or twenty percent of the community being freeloaders is unsustainable at the subsistence level. The people who work the hardest see the freeloaders take their stuff, and they get cross. They leave, and it all falls in a heap.
Hippy Communes were a fantastic case study of why Socialism doesn't work without totalitarian control.