Prenups are worthless in the West (I don't know if they're a thing or if they work elsewhere). The judge just tosses any part of the prenup that's less favorable to the woman than the standard divorce rape.
That is a big myth really. If you do a prenup right they actually are very powerful. There are ways to do it right though.
The reasons prenups do get thrown out when they do are often for a few specific BS reasons, but there are very few basic things you can do when doing a prenup to prevent those BS reasons which makes them incredibly difficult to dismiss.
My understanding (based on what a professor with a law degree and experience working in family law told me) is that alimony, child custody, and child support can't be the subject of prenups, and that there's an arbitrary fairness standard that gives the court carte blanche to toss out any provision the judge doesn't like. I left that lecture (and a subsequent discussion in his office) with the impression that prenups can be useful in niche cases (assuming the anti-male bias doesn't fuck you anyway) but offer no protection in the typical divorce rape scenario. I'd be curious to hear your take on this.
Prenups are worthless in the West (I don't know if they're a thing or if they work elsewhere). The judge just tosses any part of the prenup that's less favorable to the woman than the standard divorce rape.
That is a big myth really. If you do a prenup right they actually are very powerful. There are ways to do it right though.
The reasons prenups do get thrown out when they do are often for a few specific BS reasons, but there are very few basic things you can do when doing a prenup to prevent those BS reasons which makes them incredibly difficult to dismiss.
My understanding (based on what a professor with a law degree and experience working in family law told me) is that alimony, child custody, and child support can't be the subject of prenups, and that there's an arbitrary fairness standard that gives the court carte blanche to toss out any provision the judge doesn't like. I left that lecture (and a subsequent discussion in his office) with the impression that prenups can be useful in niche cases (assuming the anti-male bias doesn't fuck you anyway) but offer no protection in the typical divorce rape scenario. I'd be curious to hear your take on this.