Sounds like she's bitter that she can't find a man and blames men instead of her low social intelligence. This is just her being vindictive. Perhaps a man left her for a woman from one of these countries so this is her way of getting back at men like that one ex that made it personal for her.
In reality, she's not wrong but she's naïve to think the women from these countries need help. That's typical white women everyone needs help syndrome she's displaying there. The women in these countries have entire cultures around exploiting white men and they know the routine better than her. They even know which countries benefit them most (Canada) and look specifically for guys in these countries.
She's just purposely making this on twitter to create outrage in hopes of pissing off men. No one should be upset by this because it is in fact the truth. This is exactly how foreign women see things too. A woman's nature doesn't change whether she is American or Thai. Their nature is 100% the same, even if there are some racial differences. This idea of finding some hot skinny trad foreign girl to be your submissive obedient wife for life is entirely fantasy. Foreign women are gold-diggers that see men as nothing more than providers. They will exploit and use men all the same as western women.
Never ever ever bring a foreign woman back to a western country, ever, and expect good results.
You can still benefit from foreign women though. Go to Thailand and fuck $80 hookers or even just go to the clubs. You'll find hot women wiling to fuck you way easier than in western countries.
She's just trying to eliminate competition for men's attention and resources. She's a hypergamous whore who would never give bottom 90% men the time of day but is terrified of her simp supply drying up. That's all this is. The shit she's describing isn't some revelation to foreign women either. They do this all the fucking time, which why men who insist on going this route should be prepared to stay where they found her. The more traditional areas tend to have better family laws so men don't have to worry about being robbed of everything they worked for in corrupt Western family courts.
100% agreed. These women see other (foreign) women as a threat and are trying to corrupt these women in order to ensure these women aren't threats anymore. She's also doing this to be vindictive toward any of her potential simps that might go for foreign women instead of simping for her.
As far as women are concerned, men that don't simp for them deserve death so women go out of their way to make the lives of men that don't simp for them miserable.
and a man with truly malicious intent (or at least expecting malice from the other party) will have cameras and mics all over his house and interactions with her and the moment she opens her mouth to lie he'll destroy her in court and leave her in the streets to be homeless
that if he doesn't stall her, make her marry by tricking her to sign a pre-nup denying every money and shit or just outright fucks her in an unexpected way
rule number 1 of being a predator is remembering there are others in the world
Prenups are worthless in the West (I don't know if they're a thing or if they work elsewhere). The judge just tosses any part of the prenup that's less favorable to the woman than the standard divorce rape.
That is a big myth really. If you do a prenup right they actually are very powerful. There are ways to do it right though.
The reasons prenups do get thrown out when they do are often for a few specific BS reasons, but there are very few basic things you can do when doing a prenup to prevent those BS reasons which makes them incredibly difficult to dismiss.
My understanding (based on what a professor with a law degree and experience working in family law told me) is that alimony, child custody, and child support can't be the subject of prenups, and that there's an arbitrary fairness standard that gives the court carte blanche to toss out any provision the judge doesn't like. I left that lecture (and a subsequent discussion in his office) with the impression that prenups can be useful in niche cases (assuming the anti-male bias doesn't fuck you anyway) but offer no protection in the typical divorce rape scenario. I'd be curious to hear your take on this.
Sounds like she's bitter that she can't find a man and blames men instead of her low social intelligence. This is just her being vindictive. Perhaps a man left her for a woman from one of these countries so this is her way of getting back at men like that one ex that made it personal for her.
In reality, she's not wrong but she's naïve to think the women from these countries need help. That's typical white women everyone needs help syndrome she's displaying there. The women in these countries have entire cultures around exploiting white men and they know the routine better than her. They even know which countries benefit them most (Canada) and look specifically for guys in these countries.
She's just purposely making this on twitter to create outrage in hopes of pissing off men. No one should be upset by this because it is in fact the truth. This is exactly how foreign women see things too. A woman's nature doesn't change whether she is American or Thai. Their nature is 100% the same, even if there are some racial differences. This idea of finding some hot skinny trad foreign girl to be your submissive obedient wife for life is entirely fantasy. Foreign women are gold-diggers that see men as nothing more than providers. They will exploit and use men all the same as western women.
Never ever ever bring a foreign woman back to a western country, ever, and expect good results.
You can still benefit from foreign women though. Go to Thailand and fuck $80 hookers or even just go to the clubs. You'll find hot women wiling to fuck you way easier than in western countries.
She's just trying to eliminate competition for men's attention and resources. She's a hypergamous whore who would never give bottom 90% men the time of day but is terrified of her simp supply drying up. That's all this is. The shit she's describing isn't some revelation to foreign women either. They do this all the fucking time, which why men who insist on going this route should be prepared to stay where they found her. The more traditional areas tend to have better family laws so men don't have to worry about being robbed of everything they worked for in corrupt Western family courts.
100% agreed. These women see other (foreign) women as a threat and are trying to corrupt these women in order to ensure these women aren't threats anymore. She's also doing this to be vindictive toward any of her potential simps that might go for foreign women instead of simping for her.
As far as women are concerned, men that don't simp for them deserve death so women go out of their way to make the lives of men that don't simp for them miserable.
and a man with truly malicious intent (or at least expecting malice from the other party) will have cameras and mics all over his house and interactions with her and the moment she opens her mouth to lie he'll destroy her in court and leave her in the streets to be homeless
that if he doesn't stall her, make her marry by tricking her to sign a pre-nup denying every money and shit or just outright fucks her in an unexpected way
rule number 1 of being a predator is remembering there are others in the world
Prenups are worthless in the West (I don't know if they're a thing or if they work elsewhere). The judge just tosses any part of the prenup that's less favorable to the woman than the standard divorce rape.
That is a big myth really. If you do a prenup right they actually are very powerful. There are ways to do it right though.
The reasons prenups do get thrown out when they do are often for a few specific BS reasons, but there are very few basic things you can do when doing a prenup to prevent those BS reasons which makes them incredibly difficult to dismiss.
My understanding (based on what a professor with a law degree and experience working in family law told me) is that alimony, child custody, and child support can't be the subject of prenups, and that there's an arbitrary fairness standard that gives the court carte blanche to toss out any provision the judge doesn't like. I left that lecture (and a subsequent discussion in his office) with the impression that prenups can be useful in niche cases (assuming the anti-male bias doesn't fuck you anyway) but offer no protection in the typical divorce rape scenario. I'd be curious to hear your take on this.