I have seen a lot of articles and social media pushes to stop AI image creation because it can be trained to the style of a specific artist. It's constantly about how the poor artist won't be able to make mo ey because the AI can do their art for them.
I doubt this. Artists have multiple styles and are more well known for the story within their pictures. If I hired an artist who could repeat that style and do something similar then it's ok?
This makes no sense. Instead, I bet it's a big business trying to protect itself. Disney has a full department that decides on styles for art and presentations. Genie must look this way in all pictures and all artists must repeat it perfectly. Only Disney can sell products with this genie or anything close to it.
If I had AI make Genie doing something and then printed that out, there is very little Disney could do to stop it. This is the music industry vs Napster all over again.
Copyright should just die. It is a cancerous growth of what it was envisioned for, and it is the cancer that lives, not the original host.
And if that isn't the case its
All those Os resemble a specific mouse's ears. Bend over and pay us a gazillion $ for this copyright theft.
I think IP certainly should die. It's one thing to give authors some extra incentive for creative works, and another to have this whole lawyer-inspired government-enforced virtual property system that acts like a form of corporate welfare. I'd be ok with going back to the original concept as enshrined in the US Constitution.
So nothing about Intellectual Property, Moral Copyright, "anti-piracy", protecting giant corporations, or strengthening the US economy. (though I supposed there was an implication that having those protections would make us more competitive)