The reason the "0 casualties" was emphasized was because he was following John Connor's orders to not kill people (including the police) who were not the bad guys. There was no reason for him to go on an indiscriminate murder spree to eliminate a threat -- there was only 1 threat and he shot the shit out of it every chance he got.
He was following John's soy orders to not kill anyone, which of course put him and the mission at risk. Typical leftist delusion masquerading as virtue.
Ok, fine. Who would have been an appropriate "kill target" that John Connor (who is trying to save all of humanity) should have made an exception for, in this specific case?
Um, he's trying to save billions of lives. Having any rule against killing people risks that goal, so there should be no such rule. It's also totally out of character for a punk kid who robs people, but that's a whole nother topic and a typical leftist brainwashing tool ("punks who rob people are good people too!").
He was following John's soy orders to not kill anyone, which of course put him and the mission at risk. Typical leftist delusion masquerading as virtue.
Ok, fine. Who would have been an appropriate "kill target" that John Connor (who is trying to save all of humanity) should have made an exception for, in this specific case?
Um, he's trying to save billions of lives. Having any rule against killing people risks that goal, so there should be no such rule. It's also totally out of character for a punk kid who robs people, but that's a whole nother topic and a typical leftist brainwashing tool ("punks who rob people are good people too!").