I clocked out when the clothes retailers H&M were forced to pull a sweater for children from their line because it said Cheeky Monkey on the front and was worn by a black kid in their catalogue photo.
All due to backlash from people who thought that it was racist.
Amazon's policy is to not sell items that promote hate, therefore this item should be removed because of the call to genocide hidden under the cutesy art.
Yeah, I am aware that you approve of Amazons censorious behaviour, because you are a censorious little fag that thinks that he should be the arbiter of what should be allowed to be said. I didn't contest that.
That's fair play. But let's be honest here. There's no winning state in your little game so you would have to be the arbiter of truth until the day you die.
I'd rather have no one tell me what I can and cannot say, not even the most benign human being in existance, let alone you.
Because not everyone is a censorious little fag who thinks he should be the arbiter of what can be said.
The other question would be more important. Why doesn't Amazon consider the male equivalent of this okay to sell.
Gag girls not goys?
I honestly couldn't care less. I'm just tired of our 'betters' deciding that their little corner of reality and perspective is the ultimate truth.
I clocked out when the clothes retailers H&M were forced to pull a sweater for children from their line because it said Cheeky Monkey on the front and was worn by a black kid in their catalogue photo.
All due to backlash from people who thought that it was racist.
You couldn't make it up!
I had to fix that. But I'm with you.
Amazon's policy is to not sell items that promote hate, therefore this item should be removed because of the call to genocide hidden under the cutesy art.
Yeah, I am aware that you approve of Amazons censorious behaviour, because you are a censorious little fag that thinks that he should be the arbiter of what should be allowed to be said. I didn't contest that.
You just don't approve of Amazons targets is all.
I believe we should use the systems present against our enemies whenever possible.
That's fair play. But let's be honest here. There's no winning state in your little game so you would have to be the arbiter of truth until the day you die.
I'd rather have no one tell me what I can and cannot say, not even the most benign human being in existance, let alone you.
[EDIT]small change of words[/EDIT]
You just discovered that such policies are applied selectively?