Well, he dresses up as a dog (edit: actually can't find photos of him as a dog, only his "partners") and conducts sexual acts with other people dressed as dogs ... thus at least "wannabe".
I don't really think that's the point of the fetish. If he wanted to fuck a dog, he'd fuck a dog. I think the point of the fetish is the domination of people by treating them as dogs.
The Metro article in my original post actually shows him displaying the ... ugh... "pups"... publicly. That's not a dog thing, that's dehumanizing thing.
Well, he dresses up as a dog (edit: actually can't find photos of him as a dog, only his "partners") and conducts sexual acts with other people dressed as dogs ... thus at least "wannabe".
I don't really think that's the point of the fetish. If he wanted to fuck a dog, he'd fuck a dog. I think the point of the fetish is the domination of people by treating them as dogs.
The Metro article in my original post actually shows him displaying the ... ugh... "pups"... publicly. That's not a dog thing, that's dehumanizing thing.
Could go either way. Maybe he gets off on the dehumanization or maybe that's as close as he can get without breaking the law. Maybe it's both.
ITT: “Well AXCHUALLY, we don’t know if the weird degenerate is specifically thinking of this kind of degeneracy, so don’t insult him like that!”
You have no idea whether he has or not