You're the one talking to me stupid. Stop addressing me in 3rd person.
Your problem is that in your quest for racial solidarity, you refuse to accept that your biggest problem is that white people want nothing to do with white nationalism because they chose to abandon it. It, like all other progressive nationalist quests, have done nothing for them. That's why the south moved from Racialism to Conservatism after Jim Crow.
The Communist whites who are seeking to put you up against a wall and shoot both of us to death are no interest in fostering or maintaining any white racial solidarity. But you keep trying to defend them and misdirect people to blame jews when it's going to be white people that will attack you first.
I don't blame white people as a race for anything, because I don't blame any race for anything. But your racial narrative doesn't work when your primary opponent, at every income level, against white racialism are whites; not jews.
you refuse to accept that your biggest problem is that white people want nothing to do with white nationalism because they chose to abandon it
On the contrary, white nationalists are very much aware of how unpopular our ideas are right now. White people "chose" to abandon it because of propaganda campaigns and coercion and censorship.
have done nothing for them
Blacks commit over 450K crimes a year against whites. White nationalism kept that at bay. It's liberalism's egalitarian mythology (that even you profess to no longer believe in although you insist on having politics that assume it's true) that has done nothing to help white people, yet that is what many whites believe in. Propaganda, censorship, and coercion work. That's why lots of people believe in self-harming idiotic nonsense now and historically.
It's also hilarious to read a Republican loyalist talk about things that benefit white people. Republicans didn't even preserve white people's demographic majority even though losing it hurt their own electoral chances. They couldn't even stop whites from being ethnically cleansed out of many American cities.
But you keep trying to defend them and misdirect people to blame jews when it's going to be white people that will attack you first.
What do you mean "attack" ? The ADL are the ones who are usually leading the charge on censorship. Merrick Garland is in charge of the DOJ and by extension the FBI. George Soros is the one spearheading funding of shitlib DAs who are letting blacks get away with all sorts of crime and are wrongfully prosecuting whites who have to defend ourselves. Propaganda comes out of the media, and we all know who owns that. Then of course this is this very submission. On and on it goes.
But your racial narrative doesn't work when your primary opponent, at every income level, against white racialism are whites; not jews.
Again, people's beliefs do not organically emerge nor are they product of open, intellectually honest debate.
White people "chose" to abandon it because of propaganda campaigns and coercion and censorship.
White people chose to abandon it because it was shit. They were living under it and you did nothing to help anyone. Why would you? Same reason BLM doesn't help blacks, and Feminism doesn't help women. All it does is balkanize the society, and target a "bourgeois" class to rally hatred against while ignoring any real problems. Socialism can't protect anyone.
Blacks commit over 450K crimes a year against whites. White nationalism kept that at bay.
I don't believe any of that. Most crimes in all races are intra-racial. White Supremacism didn't do shit to protect anyone from anything, but it did normalize lynchings, terrorism, and race-based violence and criminality against innocent people.
It's liberalism's egalitarian mythology (that even you profess to no longer believe in although you insist on having politics that assume it's true)
Not sure where this lie comes form.
It's also hilarious to read a Republican loyalist
Here's another lie, I don't know where this comes from either.
They couldn't even stop whites from being ethnically cleansed out of many American cities.
Here's another lie. White people haven't been ethnically cleansed out of any cities. White people choosing to go somewhere else is not an ethnic cleansing. The fact that white people took their assets and tax payments out of specific places in blue cities hurts those cities more than it hurt them. So, unless you're gonna say that this """"ethnic cleansing"""" significantly benefited whites, I'm not sure why you're gonna use that term besides dishonesty.
What do you mean "attack" ?
Despite what you want to believe, most of the institutions are run by white people. White jews are scattered about, but playing six-degrees-from-any-jew doesn't change the fact that most of those DA's are white. Most of those FBI agents are white. Most of the financial elite are white. Most of the people at the IMF are white. Most of the people in the DOJ are white. And most of the University students and Antifa terrorists are white.
Look at Scotland, Ireland, and Wales. Those places are completely controlled by Leftist whites who are explicitly passing anti-white, anti-indigenous, and pro-foregin acts that explicitly target the white populations, and they are all nearly universally Irish, Scottish, and Welsh. Scotland is a fantastic example of a National Socialist party adapting to the latest rhetoric, targeting a 'bourgeois' demographic (the English), while fundamentally destroying the country from top to bottom, and damaging the Scots and Scotland in every way.
Again, people's beliefs do not organically emerge nor are they product of open, intellectually honest debate.
Jesus. Even with all your racist diatribes, this is the worst thing you've ever said. This is why if people like you get into power, just like every other time, you'll kill the people you'll claim to protect.
Of course people's beliefs organically emerge, and of course they can be produced by open and honest debate.
BUT, you've given yourself the excuse to never be intellectually honest in one felt swoop because you've decided all conversations are rhetorical warfare from pre-disposed (likely genetically assigned) opinions.
Well, what do you do with a white person who disagrees with you then? If he disagrees, you'll just say that clearly this mayo monkey is just part jew and he needs to be put against the wall. If his opinion is solely informed by genetics, and debate or persuasion is impossible, then killing him and ending his 'corrupted blood' is the only safe thing to do. You're a race traitor, you will always kill those you claim to protect.
It makes me really think, considering you claimed that jews coerced whites out of positions, but there's no point in debate. Either you need to kill the majority of the whites in this country to preserve your ideas which are informed explicitly through blood alone, or you have to accept that White Supremacy was abandoned by white people because it was shit. You won't do the latter, so you'll happily do the former.
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks. Other comments didn't actually get to that point, but this one did, because it asserts that Jews are just perpetually acting as an ethnocentric block at all times to disposes whites when they feel it becomes necessary to do so. That is a violation of this rule.
The funny thing is, in the coming years, we are going to see a "Jews for White Rights" type of gayop, and it actually will fail for the same reason as these others. We are already in the early stages of that (see Stephen Miller's ads).
Jesus fucking Christ, you're unbelievable. I'm always astonished at how the right can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, but even you are still doing it. Someone actually trying to point out anti-white discrimination, and you're so blinded by racial ideology that you dismiss the whole thing as a jewish gayop. Again, you're a race traitor by your own standards.
Lynchings weren't even that common, and some of the victims were actually guilty of shit. There is a reason they are always harping on Emmett Till. There were about 50 lynchings of blacks per year from the mid 1800s through the mid 1900s. Blacks murder over 400 whites per year. It's funny how the objectively higher number is a price you are willing to pay to implement your retarded liberal religion while the smaller one is a grave atrocity.
You think 50 lynchings a year is normal you fucking savage? And let's not forget that the south was lynching a shit load of whites too. We've had basically one attempted lynching for the past several decades, and it was Kyle Rittenhouse. Having one is totally unacceptable. Thinking that 50 per year should require an armed military response is asinine, and the actual number was fucking higher.
You're also only citing murder rates that are modern not in the late 1800's, and why you think lynchings are acceptable because murders occur. No, lynchers deserve to be shot.
Whites being driven out of cities isn't a net benefit. It would have been better for whites to maintain control of cities and stop them from becoming the nightmarish shitholes they are today. It's people like you who ruined that. Fleeing cities is only better than staying in them because liberalism lead them to be so violent and shitty.
Ridiculous. White flight is not wrong. If whites want to leave because their communities are being turned to shit by Leftist white politicians trying to secure political territory, they have every fucking right to leave.
The top ones are jews. The Jews act as an ethnocentric bloc.
No, they don't, it's why so many Leftist jews support attacks on Israel, and ignore anti-semetic hate crimes in NYC for the sake of diversity. It is because the few jews in positions of power are Leftists. You can say that the top financial elites are jews, but it doesn't change that the majority of the top financial institutions in the west are staffed by Leftist whites.
Most white people are actually still ethnocentric.
Apparently you haven't met any white people. The majority of normie, white, right-wingers aren't ethnocentric. None of the Leftist whites are. Actual white ethnocentrists is smaller than the number of white bigots.
You're the one talking to me stupid. Stop addressing me in 3rd person.
Your problem is that in your quest for racial solidarity, you refuse to accept that your biggest problem is that white people want nothing to do with white nationalism because they chose to abandon it. It, like all other progressive nationalist quests, have done nothing for them. That's why the south moved from Racialism to Conservatism after Jim Crow.
The Communist whites who are seeking to put you up against a wall and shoot both of us to death are no interest in fostering or maintaining any white racial solidarity. But you keep trying to defend them and misdirect people to blame jews when it's going to be white people that will attack you first.
I don't blame white people as a race for anything, because I don't blame any race for anything. But your racial narrative doesn't work when your primary opponent, at every income level, against white racialism are whites; not jews.
I'm also talking to an audience.
On the contrary, white nationalists are very much aware of how unpopular our ideas are right now. White people "chose" to abandon it because of propaganda campaigns and coercion and censorship.
Blacks commit over 450K crimes a year against whites. White nationalism kept that at bay. It's liberalism's egalitarian mythology (that even you profess to no longer believe in although you insist on having politics that assume it's true) that has done nothing to help white people, yet that is what many whites believe in. Propaganda, censorship, and coercion work. That's why lots of people believe in self-harming idiotic nonsense now and historically.
It's also hilarious to read a Republican loyalist talk about things that benefit white people. Republicans didn't even preserve white people's demographic majority even though losing it hurt their own electoral chances. They couldn't even stop whites from being ethnically cleansed out of many American cities.
What do you mean "attack" ? The ADL are the ones who are usually leading the charge on censorship. Merrick Garland is in charge of the DOJ and by extension the FBI. George Soros is the one spearheading funding of shitlib DAs who are letting blacks get away with all sorts of crime and are wrongfully prosecuting whites who have to defend ourselves. Propaganda comes out of the media, and we all know who owns that. Then of course this is this very submission. On and on it goes.
Again, people's beliefs do not organically emerge nor are they product of open, intellectually honest debate.
You're not that important.
White people chose to abandon it because it was shit. They were living under it and you did nothing to help anyone. Why would you? Same reason BLM doesn't help blacks, and Feminism doesn't help women. All it does is balkanize the society, and target a "bourgeois" class to rally hatred against while ignoring any real problems. Socialism can't protect anyone.
I don't believe any of that. Most crimes in all races are intra-racial. White Supremacism didn't do shit to protect anyone from anything, but it did normalize lynchings, terrorism, and race-based violence and criminality against innocent people.
Not sure where this lie comes form.
Here's another lie, I don't know where this comes from either.
Here's another lie. White people haven't been ethnically cleansed out of any cities. White people choosing to go somewhere else is not an ethnic cleansing. The fact that white people took their assets and tax payments out of specific places in blue cities hurts those cities more than it hurt them. So, unless you're gonna say that this """"ethnic cleansing"""" significantly benefited whites, I'm not sure why you're gonna use that term besides dishonesty.
Despite what you want to believe, most of the institutions are run by white people. White jews are scattered about, but playing six-degrees-from-any-jew doesn't change the fact that most of those DA's are white. Most of those FBI agents are white. Most of the financial elite are white. Most of the people at the IMF are white. Most of the people in the DOJ are white. And most of the University students and Antifa terrorists are white.
Look at Scotland, Ireland, and Wales. Those places are completely controlled by Leftist whites who are explicitly passing anti-white, anti-indigenous, and pro-foregin acts that explicitly target the white populations, and they are all nearly universally Irish, Scottish, and Welsh. Scotland is a fantastic example of a National Socialist party adapting to the latest rhetoric, targeting a 'bourgeois' demographic (the English), while fundamentally destroying the country from top to bottom, and damaging the Scots and Scotland in every way.
Jesus. Even with all your racist diatribes, this is the worst thing you've ever said. This is why if people like you get into power, just like every other time, you'll kill the people you'll claim to protect.
Of course people's beliefs organically emerge, and of course they can be produced by open and honest debate.
BUT, you've given yourself the excuse to never be intellectually honest in one felt swoop because you've decided all conversations are rhetorical warfare from pre-disposed (likely genetically assigned) opinions.
Well, what do you do with a white person who disagrees with you then? If he disagrees, you'll just say that clearly this mayo monkey is just part jew and he needs to be put against the wall. If his opinion is solely informed by genetics, and debate or persuasion is impossible, then killing him and ending his 'corrupted blood' is the only safe thing to do. You're a race traitor, you will always kill those you claim to protect.
It makes me really think, considering you claimed that jews coerced whites out of positions, but there's no point in debate. Either you need to kill the majority of the whites in this country to preserve your ideas which are informed explicitly through blood alone, or you have to accept that White Supremacy was abandoned by white people because it was shit. You won't do the latter, so you'll happily do the former.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks. Other comments didn't actually get to that point, but this one did, because it asserts that Jews are just perpetually acting as an ethnocentric block at all times to disposes whites when they feel it becomes necessary to do so. That is a violation of this rule.
Jesus fucking Christ, you're unbelievable. I'm always astonished at how the right can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, but even you are still doing it. Someone actually trying to point out anti-white discrimination, and you're so blinded by racial ideology that you dismiss the whole thing as a jewish gayop. Again, you're a race traitor by your own standards.
You think 50 lynchings a year is normal you fucking savage? And let's not forget that the south was lynching a shit load of whites too. We've had basically one attempted lynching for the past several decades, and it was Kyle Rittenhouse. Having one is totally unacceptable. Thinking that 50 per year should require an armed military response is asinine, and the actual number was fucking higher.
You're also only citing murder rates that are modern not in the late 1800's, and why you think lynchings are acceptable because murders occur. No, lynchers deserve to be shot.
Ridiculous. White flight is not wrong. If whites want to leave because their communities are being turned to shit by Leftist white politicians trying to secure political territory, they have every fucking right to leave.
No, they don't, it's why so many Leftist jews support attacks on Israel, and ignore anti-semetic hate crimes in NYC for the sake of diversity. It is because the few jews in positions of power are Leftists. You can say that the top financial elites are jews, but it doesn't change that the majority of the top financial institutions in the west are staffed by Leftist whites.
Apparently you haven't met any white people. The majority of normie, white, right-wingers aren't ethnocentric. None of the Leftist whites are. Actual white ethnocentrists is smaller than the number of white bigots.