In the best case I imagine, it might not have been a nationwide thing if not for him. I don't remember if enough accurate mortality data was available to say 'no, this isn't that dangerous' at the time (when was it, April 2020?).
It was a worldwide thing, not a nationwide thing, coordinated by much more powerful forces than Anthony Fauci. He remains nothing but an empty suit for the elites who were truly responsible. If anything, in spite of his efforts, many US states put up more resistance than pretty much any other government on Earth did.
You really think none of the lockdowns would have happened if Fauci hadn't been there? As if he was the one behind it all?
Trump could have easily used executive power to stop them if he'd had any actual support within his own government, which he didn't.
In the best case I imagine, it might not have been a nationwide thing if not for him. I don't remember if enough accurate mortality data was available to say 'no, this isn't that dangerous' at the time (when was it, April 2020?).
It was a worldwide thing, not a nationwide thing, coordinated by much more powerful forces than Anthony Fauci. He remains nothing but an empty suit for the elites who were truly responsible. If anything, in spite of his efforts, many US states put up more resistance than pretty much any other government on Earth did.