This is just you projecting a preconceived notion you have to justify your belief. You are working backwards from the conclusion you want to make it sound better.
No, most people who are wealthy learn that people want their shit and protect it.
No need for ideology, they simply do it for thrills and the "status" of being seen as the most violent/crazy of the group. But wait, you said status seekers were less depraved and less intolerable.
I never said that they were universally less depraved or less intolerable. There's going to be an element of individual context at play.
At a certain level of violence, the levels of evil aren't worth categorizing as worse than the other because its already over the line.
There's going to be an element of individual context at play.
Then there is no need for hate crime laws. Individual context is all you need to determine if someone is more of a problem than another, instead of blanket beliefs in needing more punishment based on how much you dislike their intentions.
No, most people who are wealthy learn that people want their shit and protect it.
I never said that they were universally less depraved or less intolerable. There's going to be an element of individual context at play.
I agree with you on this.
Then there is no need for hate crime laws. Individual context is all you need to determine if someone is more of a problem than another, instead of blanket beliefs in needing more punishment based on how much you dislike their intentions.
And that's why I've said elsewhere that I think it would be reasonable to see it as an aggravating factor.