What's amazing is that these are clearly bad photos. Not as in bad quality, but bad for the subject matter. Anyone can see that, and they truly think this will make the left look good.
They truly are infants. Children than hurl names and then cry over someone typing "N".
On an artistic level, I kind of agree, but everyone can tell that these images are not intended to be the subjects proverbial good side and is intended to be an unflattering photo.
I have to disagree. I think they can see that, and they just don't care. Knowing that something is wrong and still using it for their end goals? Textbook partisanship.
What's amazing is that these are clearly bad photos. Not as in bad quality, but bad for the subject matter. Anyone can see that, and they truly think this will make the left look good.
They truly are infants. Children than hurl names and then cry over someone typing "N".
I don't know, I kind of like them. It's not a type of photo you see in such 'professional detail'. They're so bad they're good to me.
On an artistic level, I kind of agree, but everyone can tell that these images are not intended to be the subjects proverbial good side and is intended to be an unflattering photo.
The comments on that Politico post are almost completely moronic support ("OMG THEY LOOK SO EEEVILLL") so no, not everyone can see that.
I have to disagree. I think they can see that, and they just don't care. Knowing that something is wrong and still using it for their end goals? Textbook partisanship.
They cry over the word “despite” now!