I haven't watched the show, but reading the Wikipedia article the ad presented an obviously absurd scenario that the plaintiff tried to have enforced as a binding offer. If Leonard claimed to legitimately believe that the offer was genuine, he is a liar.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Those stupid wins because the pool didn't have a warning that water is wet should be overruled ex post facto and the whiners sent to debtor's prison if they can't repay their wrongful gains.
I haven't watched the show, but reading the Wikipedia article the ad presented an obviously absurd scenario that the plaintiff tried to have enforced as a binding offer. If Leonard claimed to legitimately believe that the offer was genuine, he is a liar.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Those stupid wins because the pool didn't have a warning that water is wet should be overruled ex post facto and the whiners sent to debtor's prison if they can't repay their wrongful gains.