I think he's more based than he lets on. He would often present damning data for the shots (they are not vaccines, stop perpetuating their propaganda), but then add in "but seriously get vaccinated" at the end. If I was trying to red pill people while getting around censorship, that's how I would do it.
He has this understated British wit where he now says the vaccine is terrible but without saying it directly.
Google's medical misinformation AI knows it's about covid but can't flag it as 'misinformation' because it's looking for "vaccine is bad" and the human reviewers after it's reported by idiots probably just are reading the CC transcript so can't pick up on sarcasm or telling silence or implicating tone.
I think he's more based than he lets on. He would often present damning data for the shots (they are not vaccines, stop perpetuating their propaganda), but then add in "but seriously get vaccinated" at the end. If I was trying to red pill people while getting around censorship, that's how I would do it.
He has this understated British wit where he now says the vaccine is terrible but without saying it directly.
Google's medical misinformation AI knows it's about covid but can't flag it as 'misinformation' because it's looking for "vaccine is bad" and the human reviewers after it's reported by idiots probably just are reading the CC transcript so can't pick up on sarcasm or telling silence or implicating tone.
I've followed him for a while and his coverage of Covid data and related issues has been pretty solid.
He often covers information that few others are talking about, and it's been interesting watching him put the pieces together over time.
His presentation style is very old school - takes me back to lectures from my uni days, but he is methodical and thorough. Very much worth a watch.