As the title says.
Like, nothing against the guy, necessarily, but it is pretty clear that he cannot even speak with full mental function, let alone making important decisions and the like...
It just seems like a really bad idea to elect someone who is clearly... Not well. Let alone the likelihood that being in that position will make his health outcomes worse...
I understand that D's felt like he was their best chance, and that they needed to win that seat, but it just seems irresponsible all round, for all parties involved, no?
How are voters so dumb that they saw all that, and went "Yup, that's the guy I want representing me, right now!"
Sad...
Yet Biden is our president. Shouldn't we have thrown this argument away a few years ago now? The decreasing quality of our elites has many causes, but I think electing the disabled specifically is what you get as clown world unfolds.
Honestly, he's only normally biologically broken, it will probably get so much worse. Just imagine Fetterman with blue hair and bolted on tits who has an odd history with children, drugs, and orgies, not in any particular order.
It's also nice for the managerial regime if the elected parts of the government are literally retarded so they can't even form the thought of ruling in actuality. So, if you don't want to entertain the ideas of fraud, I offer you the humble idea that our countrymen are just completely retarded. Is it really such a leap of faith to imagine a gaggle of retards voting in a retard leader?
It is the essence of democracy!
You joke, but this is literally the point of universal suffrage, and the reason we force it onto every country we "free." It allows us to control their government in totally hands off way. It's cheaper, easier, more reliable, and less obvious than what people generally think of when they're talking about delegitimizing elections.