If they choose it, its not inherent to their nature. Its a product of their upbringing. Which means its not women that are the problem as they can be raised to not make that choice, and that they are being made to choose to be what they are.
Which means there can be "good" women and thereby it is not all of them who are the problem. And that they can offload some of the blame by being misled on someone who made them that retarded/evil. Whether its Jews, other women, the blacks, anyone.
You dismantled your own argument by implying its entirely a choice instead of something they are born with, couyon.
People don't choose things based on biological impulse? Look to all the poor saps getting trapped with kids for how stupid of an argument that is.
Regardless, my position has always been that humans are above animals, and while in-group bias does affect their decisions, they do consciously know what they are doing is wrong. The problem is that they don't care because they genuinely consider themselves superior to others.
Why can they offload blame? As I said earlier, even children guilty of major crimes are tried as adults. "(blank) told me to do it" is not a credible defence, even for a child.
I hope it's just the style of rhetoric you're using, but you seem to be suggesting that 'Women are literally told to do bad things by jews' is the argument you're refuting.
People do make their own individual choices. They must be held responsible for them. There are also terrible forces at work within society to brainwash and coerce and manipulate and suppress, and like any weed infestation, it will never go away until its roots are pulled out.
The entitled sociopathy of women (as a demographic) and the outsized, subversive influence of (elite) jews are both only facets of a larger problem. There is plenty of blame to go around.
People don't choose things based on biological impulse?
No because biological things don't really give you a choice. Your brain can and will rewrite reality to make you believe that you are making a choice, but you really aren't. We can say "no sex" but we will be forced with such ferocity that its impossible to actually deny our entire sexual impulse, for an example.
Even when we are granted a choice, that choice is limited significantly because we aren't allowed to not choose and only pick from options laid before us. The same way alcoholics aren't ever not alcoholics, they are just X days sober.
Why can they offload blame?
Because when you are being completely deceived and do not suspect such, you aren't treated as equally culpable. If your friend hands you a bag and tells you to hold it for him, you aren't an accomplice to murder if it has a gun in it (especially if you never open it).
Also using the criminal justice system as "proof" is bad when the criminal justice system gives women such lenient convictions that they are treated lighter than children, something I'm sure you consider a travesty. Especially as in this equation you are using them receiving sentences lesser sentences makes them less to blame.
they do consciously know what they are doing is wrong.
they don't care because they genuinely consider themselves superior to others.
No wonder your worldview is so fucked. It requires literally every woman ever to be actual cartoon villains to even function.
I mean, they do. You can just not have sex. Women would like you to think that's not possible, but it is.
Because when you are being completely deceived and do not suspect such, you aren't treated as equally culpable. If your friend hands you a bag and tells you to hold it for him, you aren't an accomplice to murder if it has a gun in it (especially if you never open it).
If your friend tells you that your neighbor is a serial killer and you kill her, you are not going to get away with saying "I thought she was a murderer".
Your example is so far from women's reality. They're not just an accessory to harm, they are actively and openly causing it. They are not just helping someone else cause harm, they are doing a lot of it themselves, with glee.
Also using the criminal justice system as "proof" is bad when the criminal justice system gives women such lenient convictions that they are treated lighter than children
Yes, but that's not actually written into the law in most cases. If it's applied correctly, the law is the right framework for the point I'm making.
A young teen accused of murder doesn't get to be tried as a minor.
Why the fuck do women get to avoid blame for the millions of lives they destroyed out of pure spite because someone traced the line back to the CIA or some fucking bank?
What is that saying about the value of the lives lost to male suicide? To transgenderism? (the ideology of radfem Valerie Solanas) To Covid, which was created by a woman? To the vaccine, where women covered up the side effects and cancelled safety tests for young men? What about those who weren't killed and still suffered at their hands? The divorced? The falsely accused? The men trapped with unwanted kids? The men who got passed over for promotion because they were not women? The boys they discriminated against in education who never reached their potential?
This idea of forgiveness is as ridiculous as The Atlantic's (run by a woman) call for Covid amnesty now it's all falling apart.
No amnesty. Reparations or bust. The damage they have done has ruined countless lives and likely set society back decades.
No wonder your worldview is so fucked. It requires literally every woman ever to be actual cartoon villains to even function.
Yeah, I know. It's too generous. Cartoon villains are funny, they're just sick.
You notice how I said "sexual impulse" in the same sentence? That was intentional to check if you could actually read, or simply grabbed what pieces you could to soapbox.
Because yes you can not have sex, that's the easy part. But you will still be plagued by sexual impulses. Boners, nocturnal emissions, and all the desires those bring. Even the difference that any man worth his salt knows happens when dealing with women if you have recently emptied the tank, versus how you won't even notice yourself doing it prior.
Your brain will deny you the ability to deny the biological impulse by making you always work within its schema.
They're not just an accessory to harm, they are actively and openly causing it.
Yes, we've determined you think they are cartoon villains who know everything they do is evil and do it anyway. Every example fails when you start from a conclusion and work backwards.
A young teen accused of murder doesn't get to be tried as a minor.
Yes they can be. Many states leave it entirely on the judge's discretion, and there are numerous rules to it. Including knowing how bad it was while doing it, and a history of crime, and many other factors.
Which is the same way women get off easy, extenuating factors and judge discretion. That's why I called it a bad example for you, its self defeating.
Why the fuck do women get to avoid blame
Because if its a choice then that means some did not make that choice. Which means they are innocent (aka Not All Women) and even victims of both women's self destructive hedonism and your attacks. You are tarring them all with the crimes of a portion, something the Anti-Jews are doing just the same.
You are literally pointing at the Anti-Semites as evil, when they are just you in a different color.
If they choose it, its not inherent to their nature. Its a product of their upbringing. Which means its not women that are the problem as they can be raised to not make that choice, and that they are being made to choose to be what they are.
Which means there can be "good" women and thereby it is not all of them who are the problem. And that they can offload some of the blame by being misled on someone who made them that retarded/evil. Whether its Jews, other women, the blacks, anyone.
You dismantled your own argument by implying its entirely a choice instead of something they are born with, couyon.
People don't choose things based on biological impulse? Look to all the poor saps getting trapped with kids for how stupid of an argument that is.
Regardless, my position has always been that humans are above animals, and while in-group bias does affect their decisions, they do consciously know what they are doing is wrong. The problem is that they don't care because they genuinely consider themselves superior to others.
Why can they offload blame? As I said earlier, even children guilty of major crimes are tried as adults. "(blank) told me to do it" is not a credible defence, even for a child.
I hope it's just the style of rhetoric you're using, but you seem to be suggesting that 'Women are literally told to do bad things by jews' is the argument you're refuting.
I also hope you can appreciate the impact of
as mentioned by u/assassin47.
People do make their own individual choices. They must be held responsible for them. There are also terrible forces at work within society to brainwash and coerce and manipulate and suppress, and like any weed infestation, it will never go away until its roots are pulled out.
The entitled sociopathy of women (as a demographic) and the outsized, subversive influence of (elite) jews are both only facets of a larger problem. There is plenty of blame to go around.
No because biological things don't really give you a choice. Your brain can and will rewrite reality to make you believe that you are making a choice, but you really aren't. We can say "no sex" but we will be forced with such ferocity that its impossible to actually deny our entire sexual impulse, for an example.
Even when we are granted a choice, that choice is limited significantly because we aren't allowed to not choose and only pick from options laid before us. The same way alcoholics aren't ever not alcoholics, they are just X days sober.
Because when you are being completely deceived and do not suspect such, you aren't treated as equally culpable. If your friend hands you a bag and tells you to hold it for him, you aren't an accomplice to murder if it has a gun in it (especially if you never open it).
Also using the criminal justice system as "proof" is bad when the criminal justice system gives women such lenient convictions that they are treated lighter than children, something I'm sure you consider a travesty. Especially as in this equation you are using them receiving sentences lesser sentences makes them less to blame.
No wonder your worldview is so fucked. It requires literally every woman ever to be actual cartoon villains to even function.
I mean, they do. You can just not have sex. Women would like you to think that's not possible, but it is.
If your friend tells you that your neighbor is a serial killer and you kill her, you are not going to get away with saying "I thought she was a murderer".
Your example is so far from women's reality. They're not just an accessory to harm, they are actively and openly causing it. They are not just helping someone else cause harm, they are doing a lot of it themselves, with glee.
Yes, but that's not actually written into the law in most cases. If it's applied correctly, the law is the right framework for the point I'm making.
A young teen accused of murder doesn't get to be tried as a minor.
Why the fuck do women get to avoid blame for the millions of lives they destroyed out of pure spite because someone traced the line back to the CIA or some fucking bank?
What is that saying about the value of the lives lost to male suicide? To transgenderism? (the ideology of radfem Valerie Solanas) To Covid, which was created by a woman? To the vaccine, where women covered up the side effects and cancelled safety tests for young men? What about those who weren't killed and still suffered at their hands? The divorced? The falsely accused? The men trapped with unwanted kids? The men who got passed over for promotion because they were not women? The boys they discriminated against in education who never reached their potential?
This idea of forgiveness is as ridiculous as The Atlantic's (run by a woman) call for Covid amnesty now it's all falling apart.
No amnesty. Reparations or bust. The damage they have done has ruined countless lives and likely set society back decades.
Yeah, I know. It's too generous. Cartoon villains are funny, they're just sick.
You notice how I said "sexual impulse" in the same sentence? That was intentional to check if you could actually read, or simply grabbed what pieces you could to soapbox.
Because yes you can not have sex, that's the easy part. But you will still be plagued by sexual impulses. Boners, nocturnal emissions, and all the desires those bring. Even the difference that any man worth his salt knows happens when dealing with women if you have recently emptied the tank, versus how you won't even notice yourself doing it prior.
Your brain will deny you the ability to deny the biological impulse by making you always work within its schema.
Yes, we've determined you think they are cartoon villains who know everything they do is evil and do it anyway. Every example fails when you start from a conclusion and work backwards.
Yes they can be. Many states leave it entirely on the judge's discretion, and there are numerous rules to it. Including knowing how bad it was while doing it, and a history of crime, and many other factors.
Which is the same way women get off easy, extenuating factors and judge discretion. That's why I called it a bad example for you, its self defeating.
Because if its a choice then that means some did not make that choice. Which means they are innocent (aka Not All Women) and even victims of both women's self destructive hedonism and your attacks. You are tarring them all with the crimes of a portion, something the Anti-Jews are doing just the same.
You are literally pointing at the Anti-Semites as evil, when they are just you in a different color.