That word has no power against me. In fact, I literally posted women in "science" laundering their hatred and dehumanization of men into academia today, with their theory that saying "not all men" is a tactic to dismiss their (non-existent) danger of being harmed.
Join up with the male genocide psychos, when their next pedo ring gets busted, as in SK, and you get smeared with them, do not come crying to me that I was fucking right about them.
Banning porn is a huge mistake. Women are already selling parasocial relationships and making huge wealth, the only thing that's slowing them down is the existence of porn. The last thing you do in an over-inflated market is lower the supply. If women's egos get any fucking bigger, they'll start their own religion.
I literally posted women in "science" laundering their hatred and dehumanization of men into academia today, with their theory that saying "not all men" is a tactic to dismiss their (non-existent) danger of being harmed.
I like that there's photos of the injuries. I hope their wounds get infected and they have to grovel to a male doctor to save their worthless existence.
Also, why did you reply the minute I opened the page? A little weird.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here?
I didn't say I wanted that for all women, I said these specific women, who are TERFs, a group that advocates male genocide. Are you telling me to moderate my words against SCUM-sucking (see what I did there?) parasites?
I'll tell you what I told the mods of r/TiA when they gave me that ultimatum.
GenderCriticals [now TERFs] will never be human beings and I'm never going to say they are. Whatever you threaten me with or take from me is not worth lying to myself or compromising my integrity by implying humanity where there is none.
Also, why did you reply the minute I opened the page? A little weird.
I'm not just a woman, but a bot as well.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here?
HAR HAR HAR the womens got attacked. But the threat to their safety is non-existent. If you don't get that, you might just be straitjacket-worthy.
GenderCriticals [now TERFs] will never be human beings and I'm never going to say they are. Whatever you threaten me with or take from me is not worth lying to myself or compromising my integrity by implying humanity where there is none.
Announcing that you're going to violate sitewide rules should be an immediate permaban, and I hope they gave it to you.
You need to space it out to separate the pieces, otherwise it's just one long quote.
No, it was just an observation.
They got attacked by other women. And yes, for the purpose of this argument, trans women are women, because you know nicely when they are talking about violent men, they are talking about actual men who present as men.
GC was literally permabanned (which was long overdue, and likely prevented some children being abused by their members). Even Spez couldn't justify considering them human and he's carried water for feminism since before I had a Reddit account.
That word has no power against me. In fact, I literally posted women in "science" laundering their hatred and dehumanization of men into academia today, with their theory that saying "not all men" is a tactic to dismiss their (non-existent) danger of being harmed.
Join up with the male genocide psychos, when their next pedo ring gets busted, as in SK, and you get smeared with them, do not come crying to me that I was fucking right about them.
Banning porn is a huge mistake. Women are already selling parasocial relationships and making huge wealth, the only thing that's slowing them down is the existence of porn. The last thing you do in an over-inflated market is lower the supply. If women's egos get any fucking bigger, they'll start their own religion.
Indeed it's founders and current majority owner are all pornographers.
Strictly speaking, all of his properties would be considered a predecessor of the parasocial relationship model that OnlyFans is built on.
He doesn't actually own a porn site as I would define one. Only a ton of camming sites.
WTF did his phony stolen password sites have to do with parasocial relationships?
Women will just find another way to sell parasocial relationships, like Twitch started to become.
OnlyFans is simply a symptom of the system they created. Destroying it will help for a while, but not forever.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasocial_interaction
You didn't even write it correctly.
Also, why did you reply the minute I opened the page? A little weird.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here?
I didn't say I wanted that for all women, I said these specific women, who are TERFs, a group that advocates male genocide. Are you telling me to moderate my words against SCUM-sucking (see what I did there?) parasites?
I'll tell you what I told the mods of r/TiA when they gave me that ultimatum.
I copy-pasted your deranged drivel.
I'm not just a woman, but a bot as well.
HAR HAR HAR the womens got attacked. But the threat to their safety is non-existent. If you don't get that, you might just be straitjacket-worthy.
Announcing that you're going to violate sitewide rules should be an immediate permaban, and I hope they gave it to you.
You need to space it out to separate the pieces, otherwise it's just one long quote.
No, it was just an observation.
They got attacked by other women. And yes, for the purpose of this argument, trans women are women, because you know nicely when they are talking about violent men, they are talking about actual men who present as men.
GC was literally permabanned (which was long overdue, and likely prevented some children being abused by their members). Even Spez couldn't justify considering them human and he's carried water for feminism since before I had a Reddit account.