James Lindsay just did a talk bringing up the point that the whole "gender" concept, which acted as a trojan horse for the rest of Wokism, only became popular because early feminists jumped on it as a shortcut to "gender equality".

They really are the beginning of the Wokist denial of reality. Sex equality is false, as "TERFs" will tell you, although they also want all the "good" parts of it. But now we can't even question it, even though we know that women cannot compete with top tier men, both physically and in other arenas like chess or go.

I'd like to have a frank discussion around rights and responsibilities via the sexes. Voting was always tied to the draft, but you can't simply say "draft women" because they aren't able to function as soldiers (imagine deploying someone to fight away from a well stocked base for long periods of time who needs tampons or they can't function). Working is tied to caring for family but women generally only take care of themselves; why should they be allowed to work without their husbands permission?

I know it seems misogynist but, if so, then so is reality. Women have a lot of things harder than men. The irony is that we have no problem recognizing this some of the time, such as how domestic violence and family courts openly favour women, and "period equity" giving women extra resources due to biological reasons. But heaven forbid we discuss the things that benefit women for no reason.

Firstly, feminism is the blatant brainchild of elite men. The very tenets don't make sense if a woman was the origin.

Secondly, the entire goal of feminism was about increasing tax revenue, and that worked. Women will now advocate for the ability to work their back to the bone as a way to "stick it to the man", which results in them lining the "man's" pockets.