No, it comes from replacement immigration. Every major demo in the US has a below replacement birthrate. It would be an entirely manageable problem if we had almost no non-white immigration. Asian Americans have an even lower birth rate than whites, but their share of the population continues to grow.
Yes, they bring in suckers who still believe in good women or are too low IQ not to, because endless growth keeps the economy from imploding.
If you believe that's not true, look at the graph for the Hang Seng.
Is there a way to grow the population without bringing people in, and more importantly, without giving women any more fucking compromises?
You talk about non-white immigration, but bringing in people from Europe would be even fucking worse for producing leftists.
Way to dodge what I'm saying.
I'm going to re-iterate it.
If you care about white men, why do you want to subject them to a system that hates them? Divorced men are second only to trannies in suicide rates (It's almost like trusting women is always a horrible idea).
You don't need a growing population for the economy to function. Productivity per worker is higher than ever thanks to automation. You're peddling neoliberal myths about needing immigrants.
If you care about white men, why do you want to subject them to a system that hates them?
I'm pretty sure we've already been over this in the past. Marriage laws are generally bad now, and they need to be reformed. That doesn't mean we can just hide from the problem. No one said it would be easy to fix such a broken society.
You don't want marriage reformed anyway. You want it destroyed so stop pretending. If you care about white males, why are you so cozy with the grooming trannies? They groom and abuse young boys, and you are doing your best PR for them.
So why did China's markets start crashing after they announced the population had fallen?
Also, it's not about productivity, it's about the future customer base.
I'm pretty sure we've already been over this in the past. Marriage laws are generally bad now, and they need to be reformed.
Reformed is one word you can use. I prefer broken into a thousand pieces and scattered to the winds like JFK wanted to do with the alphabet agencies.
That doesn't mean we can just hide from the problem. No one said it would be easy to fix such a broken society.
Is pushing the blame onto unrelated topics not hiding from the problem? Even if you're right about Jews or banks funding their platform, they still chose it.
They still chose to treat people like shit and actively profit. You can't just undo that and pretend they're good people.
The illusion is shattered, nobody's going to believe in it for decades after the full horrors of what they've done in the present day are exposed. Then again, it wouldn't shock me if the far-right would cover it all up to try and fix women's image.
You don't want marriage reformed anyway. You want it destroyed so stop pretending.
Nah, it should be like a cellphone contract. Every year you have to renew it. If you don't want to renew it, you can leave and take nothing, it just breaks up.
As ridiculous as that sounds, it makes more sense than marriage ever has. I'm sure they'd find ways to exploit it, as they put more effort into finding ways to exploit men than literally anything else, but it still works better than tradcon garbage.
If you care about white males, why are you so cozy with the grooming trannies?
My enemy's enemy. The TERFs are neck deep in the push for male genocide.
They groom and abuse young boys, and you are doing your best PR for them.
I just want people to emerge who will take them on from the correct angle, that sick feminists created this movement and women need to be held accountable.
This protect women's spaces shit is the antithesis of everything good about being against them, it further entrenches female privilege and brings TERFs into a position of influence on the right.
Also, it's not about productivity, it's about the future customer base.
Ever hear of exporting? Ever hear of not being consumerist in the first place?
They still chose to treat people like shit and actively profit.
So do you, or are you under the impression that your investments are only in "ethical" companies?
You can't just undo that and pretend they're good people.
WTF are you even talking about? Most people go along with the top down system that promotes liberalism because, as I just said, it's an uphill battle to go against it. Most people aren't even aware of what they are doing.
Also, white women are the second most right-wing demographic anyway. You have this weird idea that they most suffer for that while giving minority men a complete pass.
The illusion is shattered, nobody's going to believe in it for decades after the full horrors of what they've done in the present day are exposed.
"Two more weeks." -Yeah, sure. What are these horrors you speak of? Do you mean supporting trannies, the same thing you do?
Every year you have to renew it. If you don't want to renew it
I'm now imagining a bunch of women making careers out of being "marriage renewal specialists" or whatever and you sperging about that.
My enemy's enemy.
Don't be coy. It's not merely spite that motivates you. We passed the point of such deceptions long ago, and you tell on yourself in this very comment. You side with them because you want to be liberated from the male gender role. You hope trannies will destroy it for you. Castrating children is a small price to pay for your "liberation."
I just want people to emerge who will take them on from the correct angle, that sick feminists created this movement and women need to be held accountable.
I don't see how lying to protect Magnus Hirschfeld helps hold anyone accountable.
This protect women's spaces shit is the antithesis of everything good about being against them
I agree that women's sports holds no real value, but the distinction between males and females should be preserved. It's grounded in reality.
TERFs into a position of influence on the right
I'm not too worried about that. Most of the mainstream right has all sorts of other problems anyway. The UK Torries, for example, are just a complete mess. TERFs themselves also hate the right.
No, it comes from replacement immigration. Every major demo in the US has a below replacement birthrate. It would be an entirely manageable problem if we had almost no non-white immigration. Asian Americans have an even lower birth rate than whites, but their share of the population continues to grow.
"It's the immigration, stupid."
Yes, they bring in suckers who still believe in good women or are too low IQ not to, because endless growth keeps the economy from imploding.
If you believe that's not true, look at the graph for the Hang Seng.
Is there a way to grow the population without bringing people in, and more importantly, without giving women any more fucking compromises?
You talk about non-white immigration, but bringing in people from Europe would be even fucking worse for producing leftists.
Way to dodge what I'm saying.
I'm going to re-iterate it.
If you care about white men, why do you want to subject them to a system that hates them? Divorced men are second only to trannies in suicide rates (It's almost like trusting women is always a horrible idea).
You don't need a growing population for the economy to function. Productivity per worker is higher than ever thanks to automation. You're peddling neoliberal myths about needing immigrants.
I'm pretty sure we've already been over this in the past. Marriage laws are generally bad now, and they need to be reformed. That doesn't mean we can just hide from the problem. No one said it would be easy to fix such a broken society.
You don't want marriage reformed anyway. You want it destroyed so stop pretending. If you care about white males, why are you so cozy with the grooming trannies? They groom and abuse young boys, and you are doing your best PR for them.
So why did China's markets start crashing after they announced the population had fallen?
Also, it's not about productivity, it's about the future customer base.
Reformed is one word you can use. I prefer broken into a thousand pieces and scattered to the winds like JFK wanted to do with the alphabet agencies.
Is pushing the blame onto unrelated topics not hiding from the problem? Even if you're right about Jews or banks funding their platform, they still chose it.
They still chose to treat people like shit and actively profit. You can't just undo that and pretend they're good people.
The illusion is shattered, nobody's going to believe in it for decades after the full horrors of what they've done in the present day are exposed. Then again, it wouldn't shock me if the far-right would cover it all up to try and fix women's image.
Nah, it should be like a cellphone contract. Every year you have to renew it. If you don't want to renew it, you can leave and take nothing, it just breaks up.
As ridiculous as that sounds, it makes more sense than marriage ever has. I'm sure they'd find ways to exploit it, as they put more effort into finding ways to exploit men than literally anything else, but it still works better than tradcon garbage.
My enemy's enemy. The TERFs are neck deep in the push for male genocide.
I just want people to emerge who will take them on from the correct angle, that sick feminists created this movement and women need to be held accountable.
This protect women's spaces shit is the antithesis of everything good about being against them, it further entrenches female privilege and brings TERFs into a position of influence on the right.
Ever hear of exporting? Ever hear of not being consumerist in the first place?
So do you, or are you under the impression that your investments are only in "ethical" companies?
WTF are you even talking about? Most people go along with the top down system that promotes liberalism because, as I just said, it's an uphill battle to go against it. Most people aren't even aware of what they are doing.
Also, white women are the second most right-wing demographic anyway. You have this weird idea that they most suffer for that while giving minority men a complete pass.
"Two more weeks." -Yeah, sure. What are these horrors you speak of? Do you mean supporting trannies, the same thing you do?
I'm now imagining a bunch of women making careers out of being "marriage renewal specialists" or whatever and you sperging about that.
Don't be coy. It's not merely spite that motivates you. We passed the point of such deceptions long ago, and you tell on yourself in this very comment. You side with them because you want to be liberated from the male gender role. You hope trannies will destroy it for you. Castrating children is a small price to pay for your "liberation."
I don't see how lying to protect Magnus Hirschfeld helps hold anyone accountable.
I agree that women's sports holds no real value, but the distinction between males and females should be preserved. It's grounded in reality.
I'm not too worried about that. Most of the mainstream right has all sorts of other problems anyway. The UK Torries, for example, are just a complete mess. TERFs themselves also hate the right.