Some users and I have noticed a few posts here--and across other win pages--have been created by brand new accounts, which will likely never post again. I've seen them called spam, bots, and shills, but the posts here are usually on-topic for this board, anyway. Ones that aren't can be properly reported and presumably removed in good time.
So, is this really a problem? If so, what should be done? This board is essentially founded upon anti-censorship sentiment. Auto-modding is a no-go (I think). If it isn't a problem, I'll ask this in some fairness to those seeing a problem: how much is too much? How will you be able to tell and still be able to fix it? Tagging u/DomitiusOfMassilia. I see you've been removing some days-old posts like these recently. Is there an unwritten rule that users should be participants of their respective communities before making posts?
This place is loaded with stormcucks. They all need to go.
I have noticed that all the people who use the suffix cuck in stormCUCK, happen to be men who exist in sexual isolation while chad has sex with the last woman they cared about.
So, Chad is fucking my mom? Because I've never cared about a woman outside of my family after growing up and likely never will.
You're just projecting. Chad is fucking your blonde tradwife as we speak, but it's okay because that isn't her real nature, she was brainwashed by Jews.
and that ridiculous belief, is why you're a cuck.
So propaganda does not exist? Brainwashing is a myth?
Bearing that every single (every single) man in your lineage back to the beginning of time had it in them to find and attract a woman- every generation until you were born- is my viewpoint really more ridiculous than yours? Either you come from a long line of retards, or there at least WERE acceptable women.
Now, what could cause a transition from a society of acceptable mates to one with a shortage? Think, maybe, you could expose people to information that affects their behavior?
Your stance is devoid of logic but even that would be fine if you could put your money where your mouth is and present yourself as a genuine mind. Always calling people shills and knocking them for sycophancy, but idk if I have even once seen you step back from the narrative line you tow no matter how much face it could save.
Ironically, you react in a way you think saves face for your beloved narrative structure (by turning to superficial and childlike insults), but you are really just maintaining a deficit of reputability. A deficit you could recover from by entertaining "hostile" information just enough to have a genuine argument.
Of course propaganda exists. Your side is excellent at it.
The thing that kept them pretending to be nice, the necessity of a man's wealth, was no longer so strong.
Projecting a bit here, aren't you. There was a great example earlier today, where I brought up how not even JPMorgan could cancel OnlyFans, and your side said "but Radvinsky" like the opposition isn't also Jewish. The most hilarious part was the idea that the CEO of JPMorgan is retarded and forgot they were Jews when he filed to debank them.
Where is OF based again? The home of the More Feminine Way.
A genuine argument with people who literally use bots, yeah, that's worth my time. Go bot up another post about Kanye West, I heard Chase debanked him.