Some users and I have noticed a few posts here--and across other win pages--have been created by brand new accounts, which will likely never post again. I've seen them called spam, bots, and shills, but the posts here are usually on-topic for this board, anyway. Ones that aren't can be properly reported and presumably removed in good time.
So, is this really a problem? If so, what should be done? This board is essentially founded upon anti-censorship sentiment. Auto-modding is a no-go (I think). If it isn't a problem, I'll ask this in some fairness to those seeing a problem: how much is too much? How will you be able to tell and still be able to fix it? Tagging u/DomitiusOfMassilia. I see you've been removing some days-old posts like these recently. Is there an unwritten rule that users should be participants of their respective communities before making posts?
I have noticed that all the people who use the suffix cuck in stormCUCK, happen to be men who exist in sexual isolation while chad has sex with the last woman they cared about.
When cucks organized into mgtow squads and began to find themselves at odds with complete men.
So, Chad is fucking my mom? Because I've never cared about a woman outside of my family after growing up and likely never will.
You're just projecting. Chad is fucking your blonde tradwife as we speak, but it's okay because that isn't her real nature, she was brainwashed by Jews.
and that ridiculous belief, is why you're a cuck.
So propaganda does not exist? Brainwashing is a myth?
Bearing that every single (every single) man in your lineage back to the beginning of time had it in them to find and attract a woman- every generation until you were born- is my viewpoint really more ridiculous than yours? Either you come from a long line of retards, or there at least WERE acceptable women.
Now, what could cause a transition from a society of acceptable mates to one with a shortage? Think, maybe, you could expose people to information that affects their behavior?
Your stance is devoid of logic but even that would be fine if you could put your money where your mouth is and present yourself as a genuine mind. Always calling people shills and knocking them for sycophancy, but idk if I have even once seen you step back from the narrative line you tow no matter how much face it could save.
Ironically, you react in a way you think saves face for your beloved narrative structure (by turning to superficial and childlike insults), but you are really just maintaining a deficit of reputability. A deficit you could recover from by entertaining "hostile" information just enough to have a genuine argument.
Of course propaganda exists. Your side is excellent at it.
The thing that kept them pretending to be nice, the necessity of a man's wealth, was no longer so strong.
Projecting a bit here, aren't you. There was a great example earlier today, where I brought up how not even JPMorgan could cancel OnlyFans, and your side said "but Radvinsky" like the opposition isn't also Jewish. The most hilarious part was the idea that the CEO of JPMorgan is retarded and forgot they were Jews when he filed to debank them.
Where is OF based again? The home of the More Feminine Way.
A genuine argument with people who literally use bots, yeah, that's worth my time. Go bot up another post about Kanye West, I heard Chase debanked him.
If "my side" were good at propaganda maybe we would own even one mainstream news organization, Imp. Maybe one politician. Power reflected in the material world to compliment our considerable populism. All we are good at there are the memes. And we're not even good at making memes, it's just that memes are good at communicating ideas and we use them to highlight ideas that make sense.
Your answer regarding a shift in female attitudes is empty. This discussion is stalled by it, but for the joy that drives me to write the rest of this comment.
You accuse me of projecting by rightly mocking how every single person to the right of you is a shill. This makes no sense on the face, but then, you're referring to "the right", to "my side" and not me. But you might as well be complaining "the niggers", because the line separating you from your average bigot is NOTHING, a mundane shift of nouns that serve the role of pretty clothes to play dress-up with an entrenched way of thought.
Tons of people I happen to never bitch at are very, very guilty of this. It is often their defining trait. But what I like about them, and what keeps them unbitched by me, is their self awareness and pride: the fact that it is obvious on the face that they are bigots on purpose because they think it is right & good to be so. That is not you, you are being a hypocrite and a doofus when you behave this way. Which is constantly.
Your neurotic identity-based hatred of women lends itself to the reality that people with neurotic identity-based hatred are not shills. Behind any great bigotry is great love, if "great" can mean "maintained with reason". Lots of people hate outside of reason. For instance idk what it is in you that makes you so in LOVE with your boogeyman of choice, defending her with your life, 24/7 white knighting her pride as #1. You are hostile to anyone who holds anyone else's deeds above hers. You actually worship feminists.
I feel this way about ConPro users who cannot stop talking about blacks 24/7, too. They worship black people in a way that would make their heads pop to accept. Black people, just like radfems, are simply not at the root of the power structure we all want to be enemies of together.