You are talking about the Texas challenge to PA laws, which was rejected on standing grounds because Texas can't sue over PA laws, only PA residents can.

No, I'm talking about the Parnell lawsuit.

I'm talking about the "stop the steal" lawsuits claiming without evidence that there was massive fraud on a scale able to change the outcome of the election.

Well, I don't believe in 'elections', but you are correct here. Just letting him win and letting him disappoint his followers for four more years would have been vastly preferable from the POV of the regime. It is not something that they would feel the need to stage such massive fraud over as is alleged. I'm not confident in saying that it didn't happen, only that it has not been proven to such an extent to alter the outcome of the so called election.

I 100% agree with all that. The Democrats tried to rig the election in every "soft" way they could, the biggest example being their mass suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story, which, if the positions were reversed, would have been wall-to-wall coverage 24/7. The feds are saying they are FINALLY considering criminal charges against Hunter Biden. Again, if the positions were reversed and it was Trump Jr caught violating a bunch of laws and acting as Trump's bag man for foreign corruption, it would have been the prosecution of the decade, like a new OJ Simpson trial. Wall to wall coverage.

Which, by the way, is as wrong as leaking stuff about Trump or Gaetz.

Anonymous prosecutors destroy people's reputation with no recourse or accountability. That is outrageous no matter who it happens to.