ou literally quoted me saying what I just said they threatened.
Cool, with what nukes?
. I notice you've ignored my many quotes saying they were demanding nukes once they officially joined NATO
Source?
You're going to move the goalposts, I think.
Noine that involves government control.
. Once it ended, trying to surround them with hostile vassal states shouldn't have happened.
Cool. Explain Georgia, Moldova(who didn't even apply to NATO before), and Ukraine(predating their current NATO application by 8 years). You also must explain why should Russia control these countries, choosing what they can and can not do.
Read his speech, found nothing. This is the closest it comes with the use of the word "nuclear" and does not even say anything you claimed.
Otherwise - who's next? Will NATO countries have to defend each other? I want to believe that the North Atlantic Treaty and Article 5 will be more effective than the Budapest Memorandum.
Ukraine has received security guarantees for abandoning the world's third nuclear capability. We don't have that weapon. We also have no security. We also do not have part of the territory of our state that is larger in area than Switzerland, the Netherlands or Belgium. And most importantly - we don’t have millions of our citizens. We don’t have all this.
So I ask again for evidence. He even mentioned the Budapest Memorandum, which I already mentioned before.
Cool, with what nukes?
Source?
Noine that involves government control.
Cool. Explain Georgia, Moldova(who didn't even apply to NATO before), and Ukraine(predating their current NATO application by 8 years). You also must explain why should Russia control these countries, choosing what they can and can not do.
Read his speech, found nothing. This is the closest it comes with the use of the word "nuclear" and does not even say anything you claimed.
So I ask again for evidence. He even mentioned the Budapest Memorandum, which I already mentioned before.