We don't need their vote. If all men support us, regardless of what women do, we hold the power. We declare a general strike if they refuse to seat our anti-woman party until women's system collapses. If they don't like it, they can secede.
We don't need their vote. If all men support us, regardless of what women do, we hold the power.
How? When women are a majority of the population, and a disproportionate percentage of voters. If 54% vote for Women Party and 46% for Men Party, then the Men lose. Not to mention the fact that significant numbers of men won't be persuaded to hate women. Even in your best-case scenario, you'd lose 100% of women and a quite significant percentage of men.
When it's our lives on the line, we'll turn out to vote.
Like I said, we declare a strike. If they want their 100% female-backed party, then they can have their 100% female world with no sewers, electricity, mechanics, farmers, police, fire brigade, military, anything.
We'll soon force a collapse. A world with only HR trash and online hookers won't last long.
When it's our lives on the line, we'll turn out to vote.
It's just more fantasy. So you claim that the men who can't be bothered to vote as it is, and those who actively support the feminists, will suddenly turn and vote for a party that far more extreme (and thus appeals to far fewer people) and dedicated to smashing women?
And somehow, women would not be activated to come out and oppose a party dedicated to smashing women, nor would fathers, brothers, husbands, sons.
Like I said, we declare a strike.
We're not getting to the stage where anyone is refused to be seated. I still don't see how you're going to win in a vote.
How will a political party dedicated to crushing women "win in a landslide" when women are a majority of voters?
We don't need their vote. If all men support us, regardless of what women do, we hold the power. We declare a general strike if they refuse to seat our anti-woman party until women's system collapses. If they don't like it, they can secede.
How? When women are a majority of the population, and a disproportionate percentage of voters. If 54% vote for Women Party and 46% for Men Party, then the Men lose. Not to mention the fact that significant numbers of men won't be persuaded to hate women. Even in your best-case scenario, you'd lose 100% of women and a quite significant percentage of men.
So I repeat: how are you going to win?
When it's our lives on the line, we'll turn out to vote.
Like I said, we declare a strike. If they want their 100% female-backed party, then they can have their 100% female world with no sewers, electricity, mechanics, farmers, police, fire brigade, military, anything.
We'll soon force a collapse. A world with only HR trash and online hookers won't last long.
It's just more fantasy. So you claim that the men who can't be bothered to vote as it is, and those who actively support the feminists, will suddenly turn and vote for a party that far more extreme (and thus appeals to far fewer people) and dedicated to smashing women?
And somehow, women would not be activated to come out and oppose a party dedicated to smashing women, nor would fathers, brothers, husbands, sons.
We're not getting to the stage where anyone is refused to be seated. I still don't see how you're going to win in a vote.
This is your strategy?