I wasn't suggesting extralegal violence. I was suggesting that when, like all genocidal freaks, she faces a firing squad, it should be made up of the relatives of the people who her ideology denied justice.
What your dumb ass doesn't understand is that what goes on in your delusional mind is no defense at all when the wording plainly contradicts your alleged intent.
What I'm telling you is that I'd slap you for that, and DoM is a good deal more strict with your dumb ass than I was or would be right now.
If you don't listen to reason, don't modify it then and count on your luck. Go get yourself banned. Bye.
Ugh. I shouldn't have to edit anything on the off chance that someone actually harms the person who advocates violence against defenseless men. This is not a political thing, this is genuinely "she wants us to be murdered and openly defends those who murder men".
What about her coercive control against the male population? Why can't I just pick up a hammer in Minecraft?
Ugh. I shouldn't have to edit anything on the off chance that someone actually harms the person who advocates violence against defenseless men.
I think you misunderstood, though the comment is OK now. Firing squad was not the problem, nor family members. This is highly likely to be understood (and/or maliciously spun) as a call to extralegal violence, regardless of how you intended it.
This should be OK (obviously, I can't guarantee): After they are found guilty during a fair trial, the family members of those who were murdered because of 'coercive control' should be able to make part of the firing squad.
You get overly emotional and then stray across the line. I don't want you to get banned, cause it's boring here without you. So I give you some advice with good intents based on my own experience and the 3 years or so that I have worked with DoM. At least do what you do while being aware of the risks, instead of being stubborn and telling me that I'm wrong.
What about her coercive control against the male population? Why can't I just pick up a hammer in Minecraft?
?
Last word on "in Minecraft" stuff was that it would be read as the exact same thing without the Minecraft part.
I don't think you got my point. It really is a great irony, censoring alleged calls for violence against someone who openly and joyfully calls for violence and uses JK Rowling's bottomless well of cash to pay for lawyers for those who act on it.
Honestly I just wanted an excuse to bring up Bindel's hero, Sally Challen, who drove to her ex-partner's house to "apologise for their conflict" and instead beat him to death with a hammer in the middle of the night. Claimed coercive control and was sentenced to time served, a grand total of 5 years for openly sadistic and premeditated murder. The autopsy claimed he was hit 22 times in the skull, which would have made his death slow and painful from severe brain damage.
I wasn't suggesting extralegal violence. I was suggesting that when, like all genocidal freaks, she faces a firing squad, it should be made up of the relatives of the people who her ideology denied justice.
What your dumb ass doesn't understand is that what goes on in your delusional mind is no defense at all when the wording plainly contradicts your alleged intent.
What I'm telling you is that I'd slap you for that, and DoM is a good deal more strict with your dumb ass than I was or would be right now.
If you don't listen to reason, don't modify it then and count on your luck. Go get yourself banned. Bye.
Ugh. I shouldn't have to edit anything on the off chance that someone actually harms the person who advocates violence against defenseless men. This is not a political thing, this is genuinely "she wants us to be murdered and openly defends those who murder men".
What about her coercive control against the male population? Why can't I just pick up a hammer in Minecraft?
I think you misunderstood, though the comment is OK now. Firing squad was not the problem, nor family members. This is highly likely to be understood (and/or maliciously spun) as a call to extralegal violence, regardless of how you intended it.
This should be OK (obviously, I can't guarantee): After they are found guilty during a fair trial, the family members of those who were murdered because of 'coercive control' should be able to make part of the firing squad.
You get overly emotional and then stray across the line. I don't want you to get banned, cause it's boring here without you. So I give you some advice with good intents based on my own experience and the 3 years or so that I have worked with DoM. At least do what you do while being aware of the risks, instead of being stubborn and telling me that I'm wrong.
?
Last word on "in Minecraft" stuff was that it would be read as the exact same thing without the Minecraft part.
I don't think you got my point. It really is a great irony, censoring alleged calls for violence against someone who openly and joyfully calls for violence and uses JK Rowling's bottomless well of cash to pay for lawyers for those who act on it.
Honestly I just wanted an excuse to bring up Bindel's hero, Sally Challen, who drove to her ex-partner's house to "apologise for their conflict" and instead beat him to death with a hammer in the middle of the night. Claimed coercive control and was sentenced to time served, a grand total of 5 years for openly sadistic and premeditated murder. The autopsy claimed he was hit 22 times in the skull, which would have made his death slow and painful from severe brain damage.