has been sentenced to life in prison [should have been death]
four-year-old Gavin, three-month-old Niall and three-month-old Noah in 2014-15
"she said she feared the brothers would grow up to abuse women, as she had been" [this is an attempt to manipulate by a mentally ill person. they default to playing the victim.]
"She also said she was depressed, and admitted she was jealous of the attention her husband paid to them, but not her or their now-eight-year-old daughter Hailey." [so she murdered the boys but not the girl]
"47-year-old Joseph Pilkington, also pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of sexual imposition, for having sex with Brittany when she was underage. He had been her mother's long-time live-in boyfriend, and had raised Brittany as her step-father. He then impregnated her in 2009, when she was 17. They eventually married." [lol jerry springer shit. she SEDUCED her mom's BF. very likely has borderline personality disorder among other things.]
"The criminal investigation didn't begin until Gavin died in April 2015. Because of that investigation, Hailey and Noah were removed from her care. But when they were returned in August 2015, she killed Noah less than a week later."
"Her defense team had argued that she had suffered repeated sexual abuse and beatings as a child, and had also suffered lead poisoning, which may have left her brain damaged. "Brittany's brain is broken," attorney Kort W. Gatterdam said before sentencing on Tuesday. "And no one ever helped her."" [the only help for a woman like this is feet first into the wood chipper.]
lol jerry springer shit. she SEDUCED her mom's BF.
Wow. The helpless 37 year old man bears no responsibility for sticking his dick in the 17 year old girl he raised since he was nine. That's what you're going with?
I'm sure he was a totally upstanding guy up to that point, because no man has ever actually abused a stepdaughter. That's just lies told by evil women!
I'm not saying the woman isn't culpable for murdering her children. Everyone is ultimately responsible for their own actions, and life in prison is the least she deserves.
But this horrific tragedy didn't just drop out of the sky. It's a symptom of a diseased and dying society, and your amused "lol wimmen amirite?" attitude is just part of the sickness.
The helpless 37 year old man bears no responsibility for sticking his dick in the 17 year old girl he raised since he was nine. That's what you're going with?
She seduced him. And no, I am not "going with" the retarded straw man position you built of calling him helpless and having "no responsibility".
I'm sure he was a totally upstanding guy up to that point
He didn't murder anyone, dumbfuck. But your NPC programming has commanded you to see him fucking a LEGAL 17 year old girl [Ohio's age of consent is 16] as somehow worse than her murder of multiple helpless children.
And yes, men are vulnerable to seduction from scheming, evil women. If a hot, fresh cookie is jumping into your mouth begging you to eat it, it takes a lot of willpower not to bite down. The cookie bears more responsibility than you do.
because no man has ever actually abused a stepdaughter.
If he abused her, why did she seduce him and marry him and have numerous children with him? I didn't see any allegations from her that he abused her. Are you just assuming that without evidence because your NPC programming activated again? Why don't you get your emotions under control and start using logic and reason instead.
I'm not saying the woman isn't culpable for murdering her children.
LOL. The fact that you felt the need to point that out just shows how twisted and detached from reality your comment is.
But this horrific tragedy didn't just drop out of the sky.
So is she responsible for the murders she committed, or are you going to argue that she's just an innocent victim of her circumstances like a libtard? She didn't murder her children because she was "abused", although she may very well have been abused. Child abuse is very common. I'm sure 99.999% of child abuse victims do not go on to commit murder. Ergo, one does not cause the other. She is just a mentally ill psychopath who is trying to play the victim, and you're falling for it because you're a simp.
your amused "lol wimmen amirite?" attitude is just part of the sickness.
No, you are part of the sickness. You are a simp and an NPC. Your brain is broken and has been subverted by forces you don't even understand. I could hardly call you a human in anything but the most technical sense. People like you - weaponized NPCs who have succumbed like zombies to emotionally-driven propaganda - are what is truly wrong with modern society.
He didn't say she is not responsible for her crime. Just called you out on what I agree is a bad frame of a 36 year old man fucking his girlfriend's underage daughter.
Is he not responsible for that? I don't care if he seduced him. Are we not responsible for things even if a woman is being sexy? The moment a 14 year old winks at you, all social contract goes void?
There is no mutual exclusivity in terms of responsibility. There is no shortage of things everyone is responsible for, or any rule saying that overlapping responsibilities cancel out one another. She has proven to be a dangerous psycho as an adult and we are talking about the same person at age 14. I am sure her life is a trail of failed responsibilities and evil choices given the audacity it takes to play victim in a scenario where you've murdered your own children.
Still, nothing about that changes the responsibility of a 36 year old to avoid sexual contact with her as a 14 year old. In fact this story is like a real-life hyperbole, like a scary tall tale parents would tell their sons on a camping trip to scare them from growing up to be promiscuous.
I don't care if he seduced him. Are we not responsible for things even if a woman is being sexy?
That is indeed the case with a very large percentage of the world. I don't personally agree, but obviously reasonable people can disagree about sexual responsibility.
While I expect men to have a reasonable degree of self control, a seducer can quite easily break through a reasonable degree of self control. We all know "don't stick your dick in crazy" yet men do, in fact, stick their dick in crazy all the time because crazy girls tend to be good seducers.
When a man fails to resist seduction, it is a failure of weakness, not a failure of malice or intent. I see weakness as a far lesser problem than malicious intent. It's the same issue when you have a malicious scammer and a stupid scam victim. Neither are sympathetic. The scammer is worse.
He didn't say she is not responsible for her crime.
His argument in substance was to deflect her responsibility by trying to shift it to the father, purely because his creep factor is triggered. I reject that nonsense.
There is no mutual exclusivity in terms of responsibility.
There is for murder. She was solely responsible for her murders.
And why do you keep saying 14? Nothing in the article said there was evidence he was having sex with her at 14. It said 17.
has been sentenced to life in prison [should have been death]
four-year-old Gavin, three-month-old Niall and three-month-old Noah in 2014-15
"she said she feared the brothers would grow up to abuse women, as she had been" [this is an attempt to manipulate by a mentally ill person. they default to playing the victim.]
"She also said she was depressed, and admitted she was jealous of the attention her husband paid to them, but not her or their now-eight-year-old daughter Hailey." [so she murdered the boys but not the girl]
"47-year-old Joseph Pilkington, also pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of sexual imposition, for having sex with Brittany when she was underage. He had been her mother's long-time live-in boyfriend, and had raised Brittany as her step-father. He then impregnated her in 2009, when she was 17. They eventually married." [lol jerry springer shit. she SEDUCED her mom's BF. very likely has borderline personality disorder among other things.]
"The criminal investigation didn't begin until Gavin died in April 2015. Because of that investigation, Hailey and Noah were removed from her care. But when they were returned in August 2015, she killed Noah less than a week later."
"Her defense team had argued that she had suffered repeated sexual abuse and beatings as a child, and had also suffered lead poisoning, which may have left her brain damaged. "Brittany's brain is broken," attorney Kort W. Gatterdam said before sentencing on Tuesday. "And no one ever helped her."" [the only help for a woman like this is feet first into the wood chipper.]
Wow. The helpless 37 year old man bears no responsibility for sticking his dick in the 17 year old girl he raised since he was nine. That's what you're going with?
I'm sure he was a totally upstanding guy up to that point, because no man has ever actually abused a stepdaughter. That's just lies told by evil women!
I'm not saying the woman isn't culpable for murdering her children. Everyone is ultimately responsible for their own actions, and life in prison is the least she deserves.
But this horrific tragedy didn't just drop out of the sky. It's a symptom of a diseased and dying society, and your amused "lol wimmen amirite?" attitude is just part of the sickness.
She seduced him. And no, I am not "going with" the retarded straw man position you built of calling him helpless and having "no responsibility".
He didn't murder anyone, dumbfuck. But your NPC programming has commanded you to see him fucking a LEGAL 17 year old girl [Ohio's age of consent is 16] as somehow worse than her murder of multiple helpless children.
And yes, men are vulnerable to seduction from scheming, evil women. If a hot, fresh cookie is jumping into your mouth begging you to eat it, it takes a lot of willpower not to bite down. The cookie bears more responsibility than you do.
If he abused her, why did she seduce him and marry him and have numerous children with him? I didn't see any allegations from her that he abused her. Are you just assuming that without evidence because your NPC programming activated again? Why don't you get your emotions under control and start using logic and reason instead.
LOL. The fact that you felt the need to point that out just shows how twisted and detached from reality your comment is.
So is she responsible for the murders she committed, or are you going to argue that she's just an innocent victim of her circumstances like a libtard? She didn't murder her children because she was "abused", although she may very well have been abused. Child abuse is very common. I'm sure 99.999% of child abuse victims do not go on to commit murder. Ergo, one does not cause the other. She is just a mentally ill psychopath who is trying to play the victim, and you're falling for it because you're a simp.
No, you are part of the sickness. You are a simp and an NPC. Your brain is broken and has been subverted by forces you don't even understand. I could hardly call you a human in anything but the most technical sense. People like you - weaponized NPCs who have succumbed like zombies to emotionally-driven propaganda - are what is truly wrong with modern society.
He didn't say she is not responsible for her crime. Just called you out on what I agree is a bad frame of a 36 year old man fucking his girlfriend's underage daughter.
Is he not responsible for that? I don't care if he seduced him. Are we not responsible for things even if a woman is being sexy? The moment a 14 year old winks at you, all social contract goes void?
There is no mutual exclusivity in terms of responsibility. There is no shortage of things everyone is responsible for, or any rule saying that overlapping responsibilities cancel out one another. She has proven to be a dangerous psycho as an adult and we are talking about the same person at age 14. I am sure her life is a trail of failed responsibilities and evil choices given the audacity it takes to play victim in a scenario where you've murdered your own children.
Still, nothing about that changes the responsibility of a 36 year old to avoid sexual contact with her as a 14 year old. In fact this story is like a real-life hyperbole, like a scary tall tale parents would tell their sons on a camping trip to scare them from growing up to be promiscuous.
o_o
That is indeed the case with a very large percentage of the world. I don't personally agree, but obviously reasonable people can disagree about sexual responsibility.
While I expect men to have a reasonable degree of self control, a seducer can quite easily break through a reasonable degree of self control. We all know "don't stick your dick in crazy" yet men do, in fact, stick their dick in crazy all the time because crazy girls tend to be good seducers.
When a man fails to resist seduction, it is a failure of weakness, not a failure of malice or intent. I see weakness as a far lesser problem than malicious intent. It's the same issue when you have a malicious scammer and a stupid scam victim. Neither are sympathetic. The scammer is worse.
His argument in substance was to deflect her responsibility by trying to shift it to the father, purely because his creep factor is triggered. I reject that nonsense.
There is for murder. She was solely responsible for her murders.
And why do you keep saying 14? Nothing in the article said there was evidence he was having sex with her at 14. It said 17.