I'm aware. Its an unfortunate mixture of my genetics (both my mother and grandmother share the same "stress and blow up over minor things" trait) and a long life. Its likely that not being part of this whole shebang wouldn't have avoided it, but doing so certainly has contributed.
I dare not ask, but how come I never noticed before 2014?
Most people need a significant jolt to their system to notice. Something too big that their mind can't just file away or rationalize. For guys back then, it was one woman screwing them over so hard and the world just fucking watching/laughing. In 2014 it was good ol' Gamergate.
Even those primed to notice, like say the TIA guys, often just pushed it as "those aren't real X, just crazy extremists with no power." Which is one of the lines that helped the Woke get into power, because now any evidence you showed of anything was just isolated incidents and not indicative of anything.
Did you catch how several minority race members turned on GG?
I did. That's why I always devil's advocate people on anyone "LOOK AT THIS WOMAN/BLACK GUY SUPPORTING US! BAAAAAAASED!!!" Because most of the time its just tokenism on their part, and very rarely do those guys do more than grift for a while before turning back.
And of course, because even if they pay lip service to it, they won't support a movement that tries to actively strip away their privileges. They'll pretend to, but then make sure to lead down a path that will never get there. Its one reason why MRAs failed by letting Karen Straughn, and her pathetic band of Honey Badgers, run the movement. It was truly hilarious when they showed up in KIA to try and grift, and it was me alone again yelling against them.
That is why MLK and his folks always told people to be on their best behavior and in their Sunday best.
MLK could do what he did because enough people actually cared and supported him in the first place for it to work. If he was starting from zero, it wouldn't have gotten anywhere and he would have been stamped out like nothing. Which is what this side of the "culture war" always loses out to.
Remember that the most effective thing ever done was messaging advertisers and all those OPs, which within weeks was considered "cruel" and "no better than them." Its one of the reasons KIA1 became a little cuck cage of containment, everyone was too scared to be "like them" so they just sat their impotently whining.
That and any actual thought beyond "they crazy!" would require some introspection on the "actually mostly left wing" community about how maybe being pro-gay/tranny/women/everything woke isn't actually a good thing even without the crazy.
All it does is antagonize the women who are on your side.
Who wants them on our side? Forgive my cringe comparison, but there is a reason why in 300 Leonidas rejected the ogre. Numbers aren't worth the risk of having holes in your line. Like I said early up, they will drag your movement down.
Is it a winning strategy? Nope, and I'm aware of such. This isn't a game that can be won though. The empire will have to crumble for such, all I think to accomplish is saving as many men as I can along the way.
You have a soft spot for bastards, cripples and broken things?
Well I did get a degree in counseling and therapy. I focused it entirely on therapy for young men when I could. My senior project was on incels even.
What you see as awful, entitled, or destructive I just see guys who "woke up" and are dealing through their anger at being lied to for X years. I've seen countless go through it, some of which I caused that wake up, and its not an easy process. Shit I still have days when I fall back into its spiral and have to shake it off.
I can't even imagine Impossible recognizing anyone as his senior.
He was more stable then, though that might have been just Reddit self censorship. From how he made it sound he had only been at this a short time, maybe less than a few years, while I had that near two decades of anti-feminist misogyny under my belt. He didn't listen to much of what I said, which is how we reached the current point.
Even those primed to notice, like say the TIA guys, often just pushed it as "those aren't real X, just crazy extremists with no power." Which is one of the lines that helped the Woke get into power, because now any evidence you showed of anything was just isolated incidents and not indicative of anything.
They still make this argument, and it's just gaslighting at this point. But now, I think it is malevolence rather than naivite. Because they always first argue that "it's not happening" and when proven that it is, they say that it is actually a good thing.
And of course, because even if they pay lip service to it, they won't support a movement that tries to actively strip away their privileges. They'll pretend to, but then make sure to lead down a path that will never get there.
I hesitate to ask, but do you know that I'm an ethnic minority as well? I'm certainly not 'pretending' anything, and I don't want any privileges. The privileges bestowed on people based on race are foremost unjust, and secondly are not doing any good anyway. My personal beef is that I find it quite degrading to receive privileges based on race. Not to mention that it makes you beholden to the worst people in the world. Just look at how often they attack Clarence Thomas for allegedly receiving racial benefits that he never asked for.
Its one reason why MRAs failed by letting Karen Straughn, and her pathetic band of Honey Badgers, run the movement. It was truly hilarious when they showed up in KIA to try and grift, and it was me alone again yelling against them.
I'm glad you were the only one. They did us a service with that lawsuit, even if they lost.
I'm less concerned with something being a grift (which cannot be proven one way or the other) than with the value that is provided. A lot of leftists surely are grifting as well, but their patrons gladly give them money to spread propaganda. If you want to win, you have to do what it takes.
MLK could do what he did because enough people actually cared and supported him in the first place for it to work. If he was starting from zero, it wouldn't have gotten anywhere and he would have been stamped out like nothing. Which is what this side of the "culture war" always loses out to.
This is absolutely right. But like I said, it's got to be strategic. You should be rude when it gets you attention and that benefits you, and you should be polite to a fault when a feminist jackass is screaming in your face and calling you a 'rape apologist' - just to heighten the contrast and make them look worse. Or maybe get outraged because people will otherweise assume that since you are not bothered by it, it must have a kernel of truth.
My point is: be rude or polite not based on principle, but on whatever is expedient.
Remember that the most effective thing ever done was messaging advertisers and all those OPs, which within weeks was considered "cruel" and "no better than them." Its one of the reasons KIA1 became a little cuck cage of containment, everyone was too scared to be "like them" so they just sat their impotently whining.
I'm still happy that it exists. Some people's constitution will only tolerate that level of confrontation, and for them, KiA1 provides a good service. And those who can tolerate more come to us.
That and any actual thought beyond "they crazy!" would require some introspection on the "actually mostly left wing" community about how maybe being pro-gay/tranny/women/everything woke isn't actually a good thing even without the crazy.
Here I am also more moderate than you. A lot of people aren't going to join if they do not view it as pro-gay/whatever. It's better to lure in the pro-gay people and gradually reform them, than to scare them away by being overtly right-wing - since the right is regarded as a boogeyman.
In all honesty, in 2014 I regarded Republicans as sexist, racist and evil. Everyone whose experience is from the media and not the real world does. If GG was openly Republican, I'd never have joined. What use it is to preach to the choir?
Who wants them on our side? Forgive my cringe comparison, but there is a reason why in 300 Leonidas rejected the ogre. Numbers aren't worth the risk of having holes in your line. Like I said early up, they will drag your movement down.
I have a cringe comparison of my own. You take the Lenin position, I the Martov position (I guess you are a Bolshevik). Someone does not need to agree with me 100% to be my valuable brother-at-arms.
Is it a winning strategy? Nope, and I'm aware of such. This isn't a game that can be won though. The empire will have to crumble for such, all I think to accomplish is saving as many men as I can along the way.
Ah. Our objectives differ. More solid regimes than the present one have collapsed, though none was as internationally rooted as this. The nature of any regime is that it looks invulnerable until it has almost fallen. Just look at Mubarak. To post more cringe from Lenin: there are days in which decades happen, and decades in which nothing happens.
I actually don't even need the regime to fall. Only to recognize that it's in its best interests to side with reasonable people over the woke.
What you see as awful, entitled, or destructive I just see guys who "woke up" and are dealing through their anger at being lied to for X years. I've seen countless go through it, some of which I caused that wake up, and its not an easy process. Shit I still have days when I fall back into its spiral and have to shake it off.
And I do understand that. But the "women deserve to be raped" stuff is creepy, particularly from people who have not been the victim of anything but the denial of intimacy. If every woman who was raped became such a rage-possessed beast, no one would be safe anywhere.
He was more stable then, though that might have been just Reddit self censorship. From how he made it sound he had only been at this a short time, maybe less than a few years, while I had that near two decades of anti-feminist misogyny under my belt. He didn't listen to much of what I said, which is how we reached the current point.
That makes sense. I understand the origin of your views, but not of his. He claims that his mother was great and that he had only OK relationships. It seems to me that he is the mirror image of the feminist who goes around looking for stories on the internet about how she is oppressioned, while never suffering any in real life.
But now, I think it is malevolence rather than naivite
I think willful ignorance/naivety is so indistinguishable from malice that the difference itself is meaningless. I treat them the same.
but do you know that I'm an ethnic minority as well?
Far as I knew you were some swarthy European, Mediterranean maybe. Doesn't matter, European racial/ethnic politics are not something I particularly involve with and have an entire different history and goals than American. I don't give large amounts of consideration to the various types of slavs any more than you can list the difference between hillbilly, coonass, cajun, acadian, creole, etc.
They did us a service with that lawsuit, even if they lost.
Ends justifying is never a good place. Trusting somebody you know to be untrustworthy because in retrospect it worked out for you is not a wise move. At least not in the "worship the ground they walk on because we are so desperate for ecelebs to notice us" sense that KIA was acting.
Some people's constitution will only tolerate that level of confrontation
I find it more placebo. It gives people a nice little happy place to pretend they are accomplishing and doing something, fighting the woke, when all they are doing is jerking off in their little echo chamber and convincing each other to never do anything else.
A lot of people aren't going to join if they do not view it as pro-gay/whatever
We will always differ on this. You are far more interested in growing numbers/community than I am, as well as optics. I've long since given up on such.
Someone does not need to agree with me 100% to be my valuable brother-at-arms.
I agree. But time has shown me that those brothers will balk and falter when we go beyond talk. Something I'm sure Lenin himself learned very well.
But the "women deserve to be raped" stuff is creepy, particularly from people who have not been the victim of anything but the denial of intimacy.
Underplaying the mental struggles they deal with while upplaying their words as unforgiveable is how you create boogeymen. I've been through this with you enough times before to know minds won't change, but they aren't as irredeemable or even wrong as you think.
I understand the origin of your views, but not of his.
Who knows, sometimes people are just off enough to notice things on their own and autistically stubborn enough to unravel shit by refusing to back down on it.
I think willful ignorance/naivety is so indistinguishable from malice that the difference itself is meaningless. I treat them the same.
One can be cured though. Or maybe not. It's not one isolated bit of ignorance, it's generally a tapestry of ignorance that you can't beat without unraveling all of it - which is generally impossible, and certanly is impossible in one go.
Far as I knew you were some swarthy European, Mediterranean maybe. Doesn't matter, European racial/ethnic politics are not something I particularly involve with and have an entire different history and goals than American. I don't give large amounts of consideration to the various types of slavs any more than you can list the difference between hillbilly, coonass, cajun, acadian, creole, etc.
LOL. The 'Venice' is doing a lot of work. I'm actually no European, but Middle Eastern. So would you assume that I have some sort of secret agenda or whatever?
Ends justifying is never a good place. Trusting somebody you know to be untrustworthy because in retrospect it worked out for you is not a wise move. At least not in the "worship the ground they walk on because we are so desperate for ecelebs to notice us" sense that KIA was acting.
Those who don't have the ends justify the means are the people who lose. I'm sorry to say. Having principles is a loser. |Even more so here, when you can't even prove that people are 'grifters' but simply assume it because you find it plausible.
I find it more placebo. It gives people a nice little happy place to pretend they are accomplishing and doing something, fighting the woke, when all they are doing is jerking off in their little echo chamber and convincing each other to never do anything else.
But you think that if KiA disappeared, most of those people would come over? Of course not. It's better for them to have something than nothing, which is the alternative, and also why the reason why I wasn't happy when people hoped for the banning of KiA.
We will always differ on this. You are far more interested in growing numbers/community than I am, as well as optics. I've long since given up on such.
You can't win as a small community. There's also nothing preventing parallel communities. Ex: Someone who is moderate can join KiA to gradually reform for the better, and someone who is more red-pilled can join KiA2 (though we don't do much either).
I agree. But time has shown me that those brothers will balk and falter when we go beyond talk. Something I'm sure Lenin himself learned very well.
Actually, Lenin was quite forgiving of brothers who strayed. E.g. Zinoviev and Kamenev voted against the October coup. He expelled them but later brought them back. Bukharin even supported a coup against Lenin himself. Likewise, expelled for a while and later brought back. (All were later liquidated by Stalin.)
Obviously, this was not out of the goodness of his heart. But if anyone knew politics, it was him. He knew he needed these people. The mentality here is that you get stronger by excommunicating everyone until you're left with 2 people each calling the other federal agents.
Underplaying the mental struggles they deal with while upplaying their words as unforgiveable is how you create boogeymen. I've been through this with you enough times before to know minds won't change, but they aren't as irredeemable or even wrong as you think.
They have nothing to complain about. If they're so odious that no woman wants them, it really is on them. I've seen so many women with truly disgusting cretins who aren't even rich to know.
Who knows, sometimes people are just off enough to notice things on their own and autistically stubborn enough to unravel shit by refusing to back down on it.
Hah. But it's preoccupation of something that doesn't even affect him as he does not have dealings with women. One wonders, why.
Disagree. People are a small set of pieces that manifest themselves outward into dozens and hundreds traits. The type of person to be that level of ignorant will never not be able to be that ignorant again. You can teach him once, but if the scam is sufficiently pretending to be different next time he will be back the same.
LOL. The 'Venice' is doing a lot of work. I'm actually no European, but Middle Eastern. So would you assume that I have some sort of secret agenda or whatever?
Nah, I just remember you pulling the brown card a few times and you talked about Europe like you lived there a lot. I don't have the autistic memory you do to keep track of every detail of every conversation, and your background wasn't important enough to keep regardless. Plus Middle Eastern and European aren't mutually exclusive in the slightest in 2022, come now.
And you aren't subtly enough to have a secret agenda. You are far more of a bull brute method.
Those who don't have the ends justify the means are the people who lose.
I've already told you I fight a losing battle. I simply do not care to compromise enough to "win" a victory I don't believe achieves any of the means I desire.
That's the fun part of having come up as that "lone voice screaming into the void." You are used to an uphill climb and don't have fancy ideas of anyone ever joining you or some paradise at the top.
But you think that if KiA disappeared, most of those people would come over?
No, I agree with you on this one. I also never really wanted it banned, outside of some of the mods just because fuck em.
However, I'd also prefer to have nothing rather than "I'm helping! I'm just like you!" like most of them. I loath virtue signalling and inefficiency, and they are a population of both. I won't move to get them banned, but I also wouldn't come to their defense.
Actually, Lenin was quite forgiving of brothers who strayed.
Showing my own lack of historical knowledge again. I should probably do some reading on Communism/USSR to solve that weakness someday because I know next to nothing about it beyond the broadest strokes.
But it's preoccupation of something that doesn't even affect him as he does not have dealings with women
Which is also why he will never accomplish anything. Despite my own methods, as outlined just here, I have a long history of actually convincing people to my ideas and side. One of benefits I have over him there, and most other anti-feminists even, is I have a lot of first hand experience with women and have put many of my hypothesis to the test in that manner to see if I was or wasn't making baseless assumptions.
Whereas you can smell the inexperience on him like a musk from just words. Even when he is correct, its not out of intellect but luck.
I'm aware. Its an unfortunate mixture of my genetics (both my mother and grandmother share the same "stress and blow up over minor things" trait) and a long life. Its likely that not being part of this whole shebang wouldn't have avoided it, but doing so certainly has contributed.
Most people need a significant jolt to their system to notice. Something too big that their mind can't just file away or rationalize. For guys back then, it was one woman screwing them over so hard and the world just fucking watching/laughing. In 2014 it was good ol' Gamergate.
Even those primed to notice, like say the TIA guys, often just pushed it as "those aren't real X, just crazy extremists with no power." Which is one of the lines that helped the Woke get into power, because now any evidence you showed of anything was just isolated incidents and not indicative of anything.
I did. That's why I always devil's advocate people on anyone "LOOK AT THIS WOMAN/BLACK GUY SUPPORTING US! BAAAAAAASED!!!" Because most of the time its just tokenism on their part, and very rarely do those guys do more than grift for a while before turning back.
And of course, because even if they pay lip service to it, they won't support a movement that tries to actively strip away their privileges. They'll pretend to, but then make sure to lead down a path that will never get there. Its one reason why MRAs failed by letting Karen Straughn, and her pathetic band of Honey Badgers, run the movement. It was truly hilarious when they showed up in KIA to try and grift, and it was me alone again yelling against them.
MLK could do what he did because enough people actually cared and supported him in the first place for it to work. If he was starting from zero, it wouldn't have gotten anywhere and he would have been stamped out like nothing. Which is what this side of the "culture war" always loses out to.
Remember that the most effective thing ever done was messaging advertisers and all those OPs, which within weeks was considered "cruel" and "no better than them." Its one of the reasons KIA1 became a little cuck cage of containment, everyone was too scared to be "like them" so they just sat their impotently whining.
That and any actual thought beyond "they crazy!" would require some introspection on the "actually mostly left wing" community about how maybe being pro-gay/tranny/women/everything woke isn't actually a good thing even without the crazy.
Who wants them on our side? Forgive my cringe comparison, but there is a reason why in 300 Leonidas rejected the ogre. Numbers aren't worth the risk of having holes in your line. Like I said early up, they will drag your movement down.
Is it a winning strategy? Nope, and I'm aware of such. This isn't a game that can be won though. The empire will have to crumble for such, all I think to accomplish is saving as many men as I can along the way.
Well I did get a degree in counseling and therapy. I focused it entirely on therapy for young men when I could. My senior project was on incels even.
What you see as awful, entitled, or destructive I just see guys who "woke up" and are dealing through their anger at being lied to for X years. I've seen countless go through it, some of which I caused that wake up, and its not an easy process. Shit I still have days when I fall back into its spiral and have to shake it off.
He was more stable then, though that might have been just Reddit self censorship. From how he made it sound he had only been at this a short time, maybe less than a few years, while I had that near two decades of anti-feminist misogyny under my belt. He didn't listen to much of what I said, which is how we reached the current point.
They still make this argument, and it's just gaslighting at this point. But now, I think it is malevolence rather than naivite. Because they always first argue that "it's not happening" and when proven that it is, they say that it is actually a good thing.
I hesitate to ask, but do you know that I'm an ethnic minority as well? I'm certainly not 'pretending' anything, and I don't want any privileges. The privileges bestowed on people based on race are foremost unjust, and secondly are not doing any good anyway. My personal beef is that I find it quite degrading to receive privileges based on race. Not to mention that it makes you beholden to the worst people in the world. Just look at how often they attack Clarence Thomas for allegedly receiving racial benefits that he never asked for.
I'm glad you were the only one. They did us a service with that lawsuit, even if they lost.
I'm less concerned with something being a grift (which cannot be proven one way or the other) than with the value that is provided. A lot of leftists surely are grifting as well, but their patrons gladly give them money to spread propaganda. If you want to win, you have to do what it takes.
This is absolutely right. But like I said, it's got to be strategic. You should be rude when it gets you attention and that benefits you, and you should be polite to a fault when a feminist jackass is screaming in your face and calling you a 'rape apologist' - just to heighten the contrast and make them look worse. Or maybe get outraged because people will otherweise assume that since you are not bothered by it, it must have a kernel of truth.
My point is: be rude or polite not based on principle, but on whatever is expedient.
I'm still happy that it exists. Some people's constitution will only tolerate that level of confrontation, and for them, KiA1 provides a good service. And those who can tolerate more come to us.
Here I am also more moderate than you. A lot of people aren't going to join if they do not view it as pro-gay/whatever. It's better to lure in the pro-gay people and gradually reform them, than to scare them away by being overtly right-wing - since the right is regarded as a boogeyman.
In all honesty, in 2014 I regarded Republicans as sexist, racist and evil. Everyone whose experience is from the media and not the real world does. If GG was openly Republican, I'd never have joined. What use it is to preach to the choir?
I have a cringe comparison of my own. You take the Lenin position, I the Martov position (I guess you are a Bolshevik). Someone does not need to agree with me 100% to be my valuable brother-at-arms.
Ah. Our objectives differ. More solid regimes than the present one have collapsed, though none was as internationally rooted as this. The nature of any regime is that it looks invulnerable until it has almost fallen. Just look at Mubarak. To post more cringe from Lenin: there are days in which decades happen, and decades in which nothing happens.
I actually don't even need the regime to fall. Only to recognize that it's in its best interests to side with reasonable people over the woke.
And I do understand that. But the "women deserve to be raped" stuff is creepy, particularly from people who have not been the victim of anything but the denial of intimacy. If every woman who was raped became such a rage-possessed beast, no one would be safe anywhere.
That makes sense. I understand the origin of your views, but not of his. He claims that his mother was great and that he had only OK relationships. It seems to me that he is the mirror image of the feminist who goes around looking for stories on the internet about how she is oppressioned, while never suffering any in real life.
I think willful ignorance/naivety is so indistinguishable from malice that the difference itself is meaningless. I treat them the same.
Far as I knew you were some swarthy European, Mediterranean maybe. Doesn't matter, European racial/ethnic politics are not something I particularly involve with and have an entire different history and goals than American. I don't give large amounts of consideration to the various types of slavs any more than you can list the difference between hillbilly, coonass, cajun, acadian, creole, etc.
Ends justifying is never a good place. Trusting somebody you know to be untrustworthy because in retrospect it worked out for you is not a wise move. At least not in the "worship the ground they walk on because we are so desperate for ecelebs to notice us" sense that KIA was acting.
I find it more placebo. It gives people a nice little happy place to pretend they are accomplishing and doing something, fighting the woke, when all they are doing is jerking off in their little echo chamber and convincing each other to never do anything else.
We will always differ on this. You are far more interested in growing numbers/community than I am, as well as optics. I've long since given up on such.
I agree. But time has shown me that those brothers will balk and falter when we go beyond talk. Something I'm sure Lenin himself learned very well.
Underplaying the mental struggles they deal with while upplaying their words as unforgiveable is how you create boogeymen. I've been through this with you enough times before to know minds won't change, but they aren't as irredeemable or even wrong as you think.
Who knows, sometimes people are just off enough to notice things on their own and autistically stubborn enough to unravel shit by refusing to back down on it.
One can be cured though. Or maybe not. It's not one isolated bit of ignorance, it's generally a tapestry of ignorance that you can't beat without unraveling all of it - which is generally impossible, and certanly is impossible in one go.
LOL. The 'Venice' is doing a lot of work. I'm actually no European, but Middle Eastern. So would you assume that I have some sort of secret agenda or whatever?
Those who don't have the ends justify the means are the people who lose. I'm sorry to say. Having principles is a loser. |Even more so here, when you can't even prove that people are 'grifters' but simply assume it because you find it plausible.
But you think that if KiA disappeared, most of those people would come over? Of course not. It's better for them to have something than nothing, which is the alternative, and also why the reason why I wasn't happy when people hoped for the banning of KiA.
You can't win as a small community. There's also nothing preventing parallel communities. Ex: Someone who is moderate can join KiA to gradually reform for the better, and someone who is more red-pilled can join KiA2 (though we don't do much either).
Actually, Lenin was quite forgiving of brothers who strayed. E.g. Zinoviev and Kamenev voted against the October coup. He expelled them but later brought them back. Bukharin even supported a coup against Lenin himself. Likewise, expelled for a while and later brought back. (All were later liquidated by Stalin.)
Obviously, this was not out of the goodness of his heart. But if anyone knew politics, it was him. He knew he needed these people. The mentality here is that you get stronger by excommunicating everyone until you're left with 2 people each calling the other federal agents.
They have nothing to complain about. If they're so odious that no woman wants them, it really is on them. I've seen so many women with truly disgusting cretins who aren't even rich to know.
Hah. But it's preoccupation of something that doesn't even affect him as he does not have dealings with women. One wonders, why.
Disagree. People are a small set of pieces that manifest themselves outward into dozens and hundreds traits. The type of person to be that level of ignorant will never not be able to be that ignorant again. You can teach him once, but if the scam is sufficiently pretending to be different next time he will be back the same.
Nah, I just remember you pulling the brown card a few times and you talked about Europe like you lived there a lot. I don't have the autistic memory you do to keep track of every detail of every conversation, and your background wasn't important enough to keep regardless. Plus Middle Eastern and European aren't mutually exclusive in the slightest in 2022, come now.
And you aren't subtly enough to have a secret agenda. You are far more of a bull brute method.
I've already told you I fight a losing battle. I simply do not care to compromise enough to "win" a victory I don't believe achieves any of the means I desire.
That's the fun part of having come up as that "lone voice screaming into the void." You are used to an uphill climb and don't have fancy ideas of anyone ever joining you or some paradise at the top.
No, I agree with you on this one. I also never really wanted it banned, outside of some of the mods just because fuck em.
However, I'd also prefer to have nothing rather than "I'm helping! I'm just like you!" like most of them. I loath virtue signalling and inefficiency, and they are a population of both. I won't move to get them banned, but I also wouldn't come to their defense.
Showing my own lack of historical knowledge again. I should probably do some reading on Communism/USSR to solve that weakness someday because I know next to nothing about it beyond the broadest strokes.
Which is also why he will never accomplish anything. Despite my own methods, as outlined just here, I have a long history of actually convincing people to my ideas and side. One of benefits I have over him there, and most other anti-feminists even, is I have a lot of first hand experience with women and have put many of my hypothesis to the test in that manner to see if I was or wasn't making baseless assumptions.
Whereas you can smell the inexperience on him like a musk from just words. Even when he is correct, its not out of intellect but luck.