Because siding with a weak opponent who won't take strong action against you to defeat one that will is a good strategy. By backing DeSantis on his ridiculous argument that fixing divorce law was "unconstitutional", they have crushed that attempt, despite this being the one time state GOP actually showed spine against women.
I want someone who will grab the wheel and kick the passenger out of the door off a cliff so they don't come back. I want feminism to be removed from power and legally prevented from ever returning by being categorized as a domestic terrorist ideology.
It's been done before when a hate group got too large.
Any lost election from now on will be blamed on 'fraud'. But no, Kamala Harris isn't going to win anything, so you won't need to excuse-hunt.
By backing DeSantis on his ridiculous argument that fixing divorce law was "unconstitutional",
When you're 80 and in a nursing home, you'll still be whining about this ridiculous non-issue.
they have crushed that attempt, despite this being the one time state GOP actually showed spine against women.
Are you sure? How did the GOP women in the caucus vote? Or are you supporting a law backed by LITERAL NAZIS?
I want someone who will grab the wheel and kick the passenger out of the door off a cliff so they don't come back. I want feminism to be removed from power and legally prevented from ever returning by being categorized as a domestic terrorist ideology.
And I want a pony. Legal guarantees are not worth the paper they're written on.
Tell those who lose half their future earnings, access to their kids and more, then end up committing suicide, that it's a non-issue.
I'm guessing it was unanimous.
Invoke the Ku Klux Klan Act against them.
In a reference to the Klan's practice of wearing face-covering hoods, Section 1985(3) prohibits two or more people from traveling in disguise or otherwise conspiring to deprive a person or class of people of equal protection of the law or other legal rights.
If they're going to do fraud, it shouldn't matter. Apparently, it does. There's no one else who is even a plausible candidate.
That is a problem. Because you think yourself safe as long as it's not a wahmen. Biden is as bad as any woman, and any plausible Democratic candidate will be as well.
Tell those who lose half their future earnings, access to their kids and more, then end up committing suicide, that it's a non-issue.
It's so tiresome. You'll run roughshod over any constitutional issue because "muh suicides".
I'm guessing it was unanimous.
I don't know actually. But why are you supporting a law supported by Nazis?
Invoke the Ku Klux Klan Act against them.
It was already moribund by that time. It would have died with or without the said act. You do not understand how power works, how culture works, how politics works.
Biden is very clearly puppeted by someone. He's too senile to know what he's doing. There's only a few people that could be his handler and they all go back to a feminist agenda.
Barack "women are indisputably better than men" Obama.
Jill "It's Dr Biden" Biden
Avril Haines, the Director of National Intelligence.
Ironically, if we could convince the Democrats to consider creating conditions for a rise in suicides as an act of violence, to protect their beloved trannies, we could have every feminist leader locked up in 2025.
Because pushing that racket back is a big step.
I don't mean to save that bill. I mean in general. Why don't we use the laws created to stop other supremacist hate organisations to crush feminism? They're already on the books. There's no issue of constitutionality.
Did you account for fraud?
Because siding with a weak opponent who won't take strong action against you to defeat one that will is a good strategy. By backing DeSantis on his ridiculous argument that fixing divorce law was "unconstitutional", they have crushed that attempt, despite this being the one time state GOP actually showed spine against women.
I want someone who will grab the wheel and kick the passenger out of the door off a cliff so they don't come back. I want feminism to be removed from power and legally prevented from ever returning by being categorized as a domestic terrorist ideology.
It's been done before when a hate group got too large.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan_Act
Any lost election from now on will be blamed on 'fraud'. But no, Kamala Harris isn't going to win anything, so you won't need to excuse-hunt.
When you're 80 and in a nursing home, you'll still be whining about this ridiculous non-issue.
Are you sure? How did the GOP women in the caucus vote? Or are you supporting a law backed by LITERAL NAZIS?
And I want a pony. Legal guarantees are not worth the paper they're written on.
She's not the only woman in America.
Tell those who lose half their future earnings, access to their kids and more, then end up committing suicide, that it's a non-issue.
I'm guessing it was unanimous.
Invoke the Ku Klux Klan Act against them.
If they're going to do fraud, it shouldn't matter. Apparently, it does. There's no one else who is even a plausible candidate.
That is a problem. Because you think yourself safe as long as it's not a wahmen. Biden is as bad as any woman, and any plausible Democratic candidate will be as well.
It's so tiresome. You'll run roughshod over any constitutional issue because "muh suicides".
I don't know actually. But why are you supporting a law supported by Nazis?
It was already moribund by that time. It would have died with or without the said act. You do not understand how power works, how culture works, how politics works.
Biden is very clearly puppeted by someone. He's too senile to know what he's doing. There's only a few people that could be his handler and they all go back to a feminist agenda.
Barack "women are indisputably better than men" Obama.
Jill "It's Dr Biden" Biden
Avril Haines, the Director of National Intelligence.
Ironically, if we could convince the Democrats to consider creating conditions for a rise in suicides as an act of violence, to protect their beloved trannies, we could have every feminist leader locked up in 2025.
Because pushing that racket back is a big step.
I don't mean to save that bill. I mean in general. Why don't we use the laws created to stop other supremacist hate organisations to crush feminism? They're already on the books. There's no issue of constitutionality.