You've never explained how it is "misguided" to make use of opponents of the regime, even if conditional, even if temporary, rather than throwing them to the wolves for free, to satisfy some perverse sadism or twisted revenge fantasy.
You care about 'getting even' in your own mind. I care about winning.
For the record, I have no problem at all with TERFs, associating with them, or otherwise - or anyone who is useful. The reason I despise Stormfags is not because of their ideology, though I don't like that either, it's because rather than being an asset to regime opponents, they make themselves a liability.
Because if they actually get to a point where they lead the opposition to their issue, you can bet that blame will be placed squarely on men, pornography and women "not being treated well enough" by society. You can also bet that they will protect their own and completely ignore the interests of everyone other than women - so they'll likely allow the castrations to continue but with the condition that those kids aren't allowed to get uppity with their masters and claim any of the woman-only benefits from their ill-gotten gains.
You can't win by siding with people who hate you. Just look at GC on Reddit. Their users are still around, even after their ban, demanding bans on communities focused on "hating women".
You can't possibly think you're doing any good by defending unspeakable dregs of society like JK Rowling.
Because if they actually get to a point where they lead the opposition to their issue
For a while there was the danger that anti-transgender would not get a hearing at all. The fact that it did, was in large part due to GCs and their activism.
you can bet that blame will be placed squarely on men, pornography
GC really hated OnlyFans, same as you. You're friends, actually.
You can also bet that they will protect their own and completely ignore the interests of everyone other than women - so they'll likely allow the castrations to continue but with the condition that those kids aren't allowed to get uppity with their masters
Just more of your fantasies without any substantiation.
You can't win by siding with people who hate you
On the contrary, you win by creating a coalition - whatever coalition - of people who hate the established order, whether or not they 'hate' you.
You can't possibly think you're doing any good by defending unspeakable dregs of society like JK Rowling.
Rowling has done incredible good. I despised her before she showed her spine and great courage. I don't like that she is a feminist, but I'll take the good with the bad.
All men, after all, like Aeschylus said about lives, are mixtures of good and bad.
I don't think so. It got a hearing because of regular people complaining about them to the point that the Republican Party latched onto it as a policy issue.
Yeah, but they portray the sellers as victims. They're far from it.
Feminists are well-known for backstabbing whatever cause they claim to support after women get their part.
When has that ever worked? Coalitions across political spectrums have been done before, in Italy, and they're always a disaster.
Rowling is one of the worst. She was a strong backer of Coercive Control law and credits herself as the friend and confidante of the woman who led the charge, Julie Bindel.
Because you are just misguided, thinking you can build a strategy around them. The actual people who associate with TERFs are evil.
You've never explained how it is "misguided" to make use of opponents of the regime, even if conditional, even if temporary, rather than throwing them to the wolves for free, to satisfy some perverse sadism or twisted revenge fantasy.
You care about 'getting even' in your own mind. I care about winning.
For the record, I have no problem at all with TERFs, associating with them, or otherwise - or anyone who is useful. The reason I despise Stormfags is not because of their ideology, though I don't like that either, it's because rather than being an asset to regime opponents, they make themselves a liability.
Because if they actually get to a point where they lead the opposition to their issue, you can bet that blame will be placed squarely on men, pornography and women "not being treated well enough" by society. You can also bet that they will protect their own and completely ignore the interests of everyone other than women - so they'll likely allow the castrations to continue but with the condition that those kids aren't allowed to get uppity with their masters and claim any of the woman-only benefits from their ill-gotten gains.
You can't win by siding with people who hate you. Just look at GC on Reddit. Their users are still around, even after their ban, demanding bans on communities focused on "hating women".
You can't possibly think you're doing any good by defending unspeakable dregs of society like JK Rowling.
For a while there was the danger that anti-transgender would not get a hearing at all. The fact that it did, was in large part due to GCs and their activism.
GC really hated OnlyFans, same as you. You're friends, actually.
Just more of your fantasies without any substantiation.
On the contrary, you win by creating a coalition - whatever coalition - of people who hate the established order, whether or not they 'hate' you.
Rowling has done incredible good. I despised her before she showed her spine and great courage. I don't like that she is a feminist, but I'll take the good with the bad.
All men, after all, like Aeschylus said about lives, are mixtures of good and bad.
I don't think so. It got a hearing because of regular people complaining about them to the point that the Republican Party latched onto it as a policy issue.
Yeah, but they portray the sellers as victims. They're far from it.
Feminists are well-known for backstabbing whatever cause they claim to support after women get their part.
When has that ever worked? Coalitions across political spectrums have been done before, in Italy, and they're always a disaster.
Rowling is one of the worst. She was a strong backer of Coercive Control law and credits herself as the friend and confidante of the woman who led the charge, Julie Bindel.