i have a gay friend who i play games with from time to time. he hates feminists and dont like trannies. lol, he also believes in eugenics to prevent people from being born who might have defects that would negatively affect their lives. xD..
But gays can still contribute to society in other ways - via working and doing stuff child-raisers don't have time or money for, as was basically their traditional place in society. The child-havers just have that third kid to make up for the gay ones.
A detrimental gene would be the ones that cause "autism" and create the real droolers that can't learn at all, and can never do anything more than giggle, grin, and piss their pants, and need their bums wiped by competent humans who could be doing something more productive. And yes, two "slow" people are likely to create one of these, which is why they were sterilized in the past (they're not legally allowed to have sex with mental normals anyway, being on the legal-mental level of children and non-humans.) And by fuck, a dog breeder would be demonized for trying to mate two merles together, it should be just as horrifying to let genetic retards and mutant cripples amongst humans to breed more of themselves, too.
No, but they're not trashing it, either. They're basically on the same level as contributing non-humans (dogs, cats and horses). They contribute socially or economically, not genetically. There's no point in doing anything to them sterilization-wise, because they're not going to breed, anyway. The whole point of eugenics isn't just to make better individuals, but also a better species overall, and that would include its society (and that goes for ANY social species .. and humans are social apes, not asocial bears.)
This is where I think the wokeists are shitty and sneaky - their idea of "diversity" begins and ends with human skin colour.
i have a gay friend who i play games with from time to time. he hates feminists and dont like trannies. lol, he also believes in eugenics to prevent people from being born who might have defects that would negatively affect their lives. xD..
But gays can still contribute to society in other ways - via working and doing stuff child-raisers don't have time or money for, as was basically their traditional place in society. The child-havers just have that third kid to make up for the gay ones.
A detrimental gene would be the ones that cause "autism" and create the real droolers that can't learn at all, and can never do anything more than giggle, grin, and piss their pants, and need their bums wiped by competent humans who could be doing something more productive. And yes, two "slow" people are likely to create one of these, which is why they were sterilized in the past (they're not legally allowed to have sex with mental normals anyway, being on the legal-mental level of children and non-humans.) And by fuck, a dog breeder would be demonized for trying to mate two merles together, it should be just as horrifying to let genetic retards and mutant cripples amongst humans to breed more of themselves, too.
No, but they're not trashing it, either. They're basically on the same level as contributing non-humans (dogs, cats and horses). They contribute socially or economically, not genetically. There's no point in doing anything to them sterilization-wise, because they're not going to breed, anyway. The whole point of eugenics isn't just to make better individuals, but also a better species overall, and that would include its society (and that goes for ANY social species .. and humans are social apes, not asocial bears.)
This is where I think the wokeists are shitty and sneaky - their idea of "diversity" begins and ends with human skin colour.