No, but they're not trashing it, either. They're basically on the same level as contributing non-humans (dogs, cats and horses). They contribute socially or economically, not genetically. There's no point in doing anything to them sterilization-wise, because they're not going to breed, anyway. The whole point of eugenics isn't just to make better individuals, but also a better species overall, and that would include its society (and that goes for ANY social species .. and humans are social apes, not asocial bears.)
This is where I think the wokeists are shitty and sneaky - their idea of "diversity" begins and ends with human skin colour.
They're basically on the same level as contributing non-humans (dogs, cats and horses)
Funny considering Alexander the great named cities after his dog, meaning even the dog of a "gay" have contributed more historically, socially and economically than a "straight" making retarded statements on the internet, not to mention he had a biological child, something I'm afraid people like you will die chasing until they realize their tradthot family fantasy is only that, a fantasy.
They contribute socially or economically, not genetically. There's no point in doing anything to them sterilization-wise, because they're not going to breed, anyway.
Every single time there's a moronic incel pretending gays and lesbians cannot reproduce. I guess they truly believe if they repeat the same stupidity over and over again it becomes true? I suppose they turn a blind eye everytime they see a pregnant lesbian, a surrogate mother or sperm banks, if they ever leave the basement that is. I mean, maybe I'm imagining the homosexual parents with genetic children I know of. This shit about pretending homosexual people are somehow unable to have children is really no different than the wokes pretending really hard you can change your sex; biological facts don't care about your feelings, political stances or religions.
I didn't say they CAN'T. Of course they can, biologically. And many did in the past, when they found themselves in "show" marriages. But if left to their own devices to be exclusively homosexual, they're not going to breed. And many didn't (think of the homosexuals who spent their lives single as travelling entertainers in the days before electricity and mass media.)
And boy, do you make a lot of assumptions about who you're talking to. They're all wrong, btw.
No, but they're not trashing it, either. They're basically on the same level as contributing non-humans (dogs, cats and horses). They contribute socially or economically, not genetically. There's no point in doing anything to them sterilization-wise, because they're not going to breed, anyway. The whole point of eugenics isn't just to make better individuals, but also a better species overall, and that would include its society (and that goes for ANY social species .. and humans are social apes, not asocial bears.)
This is where I think the wokeists are shitty and sneaky - their idea of "diversity" begins and ends with human skin colour.
Funny considering Alexander the great named cities after his dog, meaning even the dog of a "gay" have contributed more historically, socially and economically than a "straight" making retarded statements on the internet, not to mention he had a biological child, something I'm afraid people like you will die chasing until they realize their tradthot family fantasy is only that, a fantasy.
Every single time there's a moronic incel pretending gays and lesbians cannot reproduce. I guess they truly believe if they repeat the same stupidity over and over again it becomes true? I suppose they turn a blind eye everytime they see a pregnant lesbian, a surrogate mother or sperm banks, if they ever leave the basement that is. I mean, maybe I'm imagining the homosexual parents with genetic children I know of. This shit about pretending homosexual people are somehow unable to have children is really no different than the wokes pretending really hard you can change your sex; biological facts don't care about your feelings, political stances or religions.
I didn't say they CAN'T. Of course they can, biologically. And many did in the past, when they found themselves in "show" marriages. But if left to their own devices to be exclusively homosexual, they're not going to breed. And many didn't (think of the homosexuals who spent their lives single as travelling entertainers in the days before electricity and mass media.)
And boy, do you make a lot of assumptions about who you're talking to. They're all wrong, btw.