He's always been pro-extinction by making it near impossible for children to exist. After all, any single benefit women get, and also marriage, are just tradcuck traps to his worldview.
I don’t know much about Hungary. Do they get money regardless of whether or not they are married? Incentivizing single motherhood seems like a pretty bad idea.
Yes, an expense for the person who wants one, not for everyone else. A Ferrari would make me happy, but I don't ask the government to buy me one. Or for a less mocking example, a Roomba would make my life easier, but the state won't buy one for me.
I disagree. Those with families are more likely to have to take time off to deal with their issues.
If your population doesn't have a fertility rate of 2.1, you end up with the economic dead weight of more retirees than workers.
Any person without two children is a future economic burden that will necessitate the import of foreigners to take care of them. A low fertility rate is the death knell of civilization.
What you're actually saying is that the idea of a state pension, as popularized by European countries, is a deal with the devil.
No, I'm not.
It matters not where the money to support the elderly comes from - what matters is that there are enough young people to do it. All the money in the world doesn't make 100 workers support 200 retirees. All it does is give you the money to bring in 100 foreigners to pick up the slack.
And now your country is full of foreigners. GG, civilization collapses.
Newsflash 1: Child-bearing women who maintain the home are an economic expense and always will be.
Newsflash 2: A productive man without a family is not as productive as a productive man with a family.
You are proud of blindness.
He's always been pro-extinction by making it near impossible for children to exist. After all, any single benefit women get, and also marriage, are just tradcuck traps to his worldview.
I don’t know much about Hungary. Do they get money regardless of whether or not they are married? Incentivizing single motherhood seems like a pretty bad idea.
It's certainly not great, but it's not as bad when the children aren't black.
Yes, an expense for the person who wants one, not for everyone else. A Ferrari would make me happy, but I don't ask the government to buy me one. Or for a less mocking example, a Roomba would make my life easier, but the state won't buy one for me.
I disagree. Those with families are more likely to have to take time off to deal with their issues.
God, you're a fool.
If your population doesn't have a fertility rate of 2.1, you end up with the economic dead weight of more retirees than workers.
Any person without two children is a future economic burden that will necessitate the import of foreigners to take care of them. A low fertility rate is the death knell of civilization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societal_collapse#Demographic_dynamics
Read it and weep.
I'm pretty sure people retiring should have their own savings. I started saving for an early retirement at 21.
What you're actually saying is that the idea of a state pension, as popularized by European countries, is a deal with the devil.
I'm fully on board with cutting government spending, especially on women.
Also, haven't people been fearmongering Japan collapsing for literal decades now?
USA Q2 22 GDP : -0.6%
Japan Q2 22 GDP : +3.5%
Someone tell the stormcucks, they did it way before Israel, or even America, was a dream in someone's head.
No, I'm not.
It matters not where the money to support the elderly comes from - what matters is that there are enough young people to do it. All the money in the world doesn't make 100 workers support 200 retirees. All it does is give you the money to bring in 100 foreigners to pick up the slack.
And now your country is full of foreigners. GG, civilization collapses.