I've read that she is anti-pedo and was bringing this up to point out the absurdity of calling them 'MAPs' and justifying their behavior. Still probably not something to bring up in class regardless.
Nah she was being completely unironic. The board investigated her and apparently there was even more beyond that tic tok video, but she wasn't being sarcastic or anything.
"Board trustee Daniel Call initially said, citing a district spokesperson, that the teacher’s comments were taken out of context. Instead, Parker was “pretending to advocate a position she didn’t actually believe in (in) order to challenge the students in preparation for them reading the book ‘The Crucible,’” Call said."
But if you read the MSN article, that same board member Daniel Call changed his tune and says there's no way he could've voted to keep her on the faculty.
It was a clip on tik-tok probably taken out of context but is hard for me to see a good context.
Is not along the lines of some people are trying to justify pedophiles by calling them map, it was :
“Stop calling them that. You’re not allowed to label people like that. Stop it… We’re not gonna call them that. … We’re gonna call them MAPs — Minor-Attracted Persons. So don’t judge people just because they wanna have sex with a five-year-old.”
Maybe it was an example of gaslighting, I could see it but I found nothing about it.
This is a really common speech tool where you speak rhetorically as if you were on the other side. Example: "Trump is like 'We need to build a big glorious wall'. Well, NO! He's wrong and racist and evil and orange." (then take out of context 'we need to build a big glorious wall' makes them sound like a trump supporter)
I mean, just think about it; saying this shit is beyond crazy even for their side at the current moment. Even if they were for calling pedos 'MAPs', they would never say 'don't judge people just because they wanna have sex with a five-year-old.' That's right-wing framing of the issue.
I just don't wanna dogpile someone who's on our side. That said I haven't hear the full tape so I could be wrong.
Yeah, when lefties were caught out trying to backdoor the term "MAP" into common use, they dropped it real fast, and that was a couple years ago now. It's not often that you see a leftist so out of date on their own strategy, and it's unlikely that you'd see an actual leftist pedo using that language in such a public place - they've already got much more discrete and effective ways to normalize it. It's only their opposition that still uses the term, only ever in reference to leftist pedo advocacy, and even then, more so from conservatives than actual reactionaries.
I suppose it's possible she's just a particularly stupid sperg, but it's a weird enough situation that you'd need to take a closer look to know for sure.
I've read that she is anti-pedo and was bringing this up to point out the absurdity of calling them 'MAPs' and justifying their behavior. Still probably not something to bring up in class regardless.
Nah she was being completely unironic. The board investigated her and apparently there was even more beyond that tic tok video, but she wasn't being sarcastic or anything.
She has since been fired.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220913030043/https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/teacher-fired-for-telling-students-to-call-pedophiles-minor-attracted-persons-instead/ar-AA11K8Ix
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/nation-world/national/article265551171.html
"Board trustee Daniel Call initially said, citing a district spokesperson, that the teacher’s comments were taken out of context. Instead, Parker was “pretending to advocate a position she didn’t actually believe in (in) order to challenge the students in preparation for them reading the book ‘The Crucible,’” Call said."
Yeah I fuckin doubt it lmao.
That doesn't even make sense in regards to The Crucible. Nobody in that book advocates for a cause they don't actually believe in.
She was caught being a pedo and is embarrassed and worried so now she's lying. Shocker.
But if you read the MSN article, that same board member Daniel Call changed his tune and says there's no way he could've voted to keep her on the faculty.
It was a clip on tik-tok probably taken out of context but is hard for me to see a good context.
Is not along the lines of some people are trying to justify pedophiles by calling them map, it was :
Maybe it was an example of gaslighting, I could see it but I found nothing about it.
This is a really common speech tool where you speak rhetorically as if you were on the other side. Example: "Trump is like 'We need to build a big glorious wall'. Well, NO! He's wrong and racist and evil and orange." (then take out of context 'we need to build a big glorious wall' makes them sound like a trump supporter)
I mean, just think about it; saying this shit is beyond crazy even for their side at the current moment. Even if they were for calling pedos 'MAPs', they would never say 'don't judge people just because they wanna have sex with a five-year-old.' That's right-wing framing of the issue.
I just don't wanna dogpile someone who's on our side. That said I haven't hear the full tape so I could be wrong.
It makes sense
Yeah, when lefties were caught out trying to backdoor the term "MAP" into common use, they dropped it real fast, and that was a couple years ago now. It's not often that you see a leftist so out of date on their own strategy, and it's unlikely that you'd see an actual leftist pedo using that language in such a public place - they've already got much more discrete and effective ways to normalize it. It's only their opposition that still uses the term, only ever in reference to leftist pedo advocacy, and even then, more so from conservatives than actual reactionaries.
I suppose it's possible she's just a particularly stupid sperg, but it's a weird enough situation that you'd need to take a closer look to know for sure.