I'm all for keeping guys out of women's spaces, but good god these two are insufferable. Near the end of the interview (spoilers!) they talk about their history of activism, and I'm just thinking, "yeah, you helped create this situation. Good job, hero."
According to these two, it's all about saving women, protecting women and children, an attack on women, an attack on women's rights. What they fail to understand is that, no, it's about the left protecting weirdos because that's who the left likes to help. They encourage misery because they think misery is a good thing.
They'll ultimately fail because they don't even understand what they're up against.
it's all about saving women, protecting women and children, an attack on women, an attack on women's rights.
What do you expect, this is women's playbook for any situation that feminism can't defeat. Cry until the tradcucks save them.
I still think it's odd. There's something weird about this situation. We all know women could end it tomorrow if they were genuinely uncomfortable, so why haven't they? Are they letting it happen to test what the new right's tendency to do women's bidding is?
It's less "women's playbook" and more "human nature".
The human animal is biologically hardwired to prioritize the well being of women because they are the limiting factor on reproduction. It's an evolved psychological trait.
We all know women could end it tomorrow if they were genuinely uncomfortable, so why haven't they?
This may shock you, but women aren't all marching in lockstep.
For every women who is full TERF and hates this, there is another that is happily making the situation worse. For someone with a low opinion of women, you sure assign them a lot of positive traits like cohesion, solidarity and loyalty to a cause.
I'm all for keeping guys out of women's spaces, but good god these two are insufferable. Near the end of the interview (spoilers!) they talk about their history of activism, and I'm just thinking, "yeah, you helped create this situation. Good job, hero."
According to these two, it's all about saving women, protecting women and children, an attack on women, an attack on women's rights. What they fail to understand is that, no, it's about the left protecting weirdos because that's who the left likes to help. They encourage misery because they think misery is a good thing.
They'll ultimately fail because they don't even understand what they're up against.
What do you expect, this is women's playbook for any situation that feminism can't defeat. Cry until the tradcucks save them.
I still think it's odd. There's something weird about this situation. We all know women could end it tomorrow if they were genuinely uncomfortable, so why haven't they? Are they letting it happen to test what the new right's tendency to do women's bidding is?
It's less "women's playbook" and more "human nature".
The human animal is biologically hardwired to prioritize the well being of women because they are the limiting factor on reproduction. It's an evolved psychological trait.
This may shock you, but women aren't all marching in lockstep.
For every women who is full TERF and hates this, there is another that is happily making the situation worse. For someone with a low opinion of women, you sure assign them a lot of positive traits like cohesion, solidarity and loyalty to a cause.