So do you support removing anyone who doesn't benefit society, or just black people? What about Jews? Latinos? Do you support removing individuals or just racial groups? How do you measure benefit to society? Do you only consider scientific contribution, or do you include food, music, art and culture? Is anyone who doesn't contribute worthy of hatred and expulsion? What about the weak, disabled and disadvantaged?
Let me repeat, racial hatred is stupid and irrational. I could almost certainly make the same argument that some group that you're a member of isn't "worth the hassle". You have no idea where that path leads and how it would inevitably bite you in the back.
an average black person contributes net 500k to 750k negative over his lifetime. a Latino contributes something like 300k negative. only Asians and whites are net positive contributors. blacks commit 80% of interracial crimes and rapes, Latino takes the other almost 10%. blacks contributed nothing valuable in arts, culture and muh food. name one country that became better by having more blacks.
blacks as a group contributed nothing of value to the the world, what little contributions some talented individuals did were not worth the over represented violence, crimes and welfare usage the rest of the race committed.
You seem to think the value of a person is directly related to their net-income over a lifetime... an absolutely terrible metric that would put movie stars and politicians near the top of the value pyramid despite contributing the most to cultural and political corruption and decay.
As with all groups, the vast majority of crimes are committed by a relatively small percentage of the population. That doesn't seem to enter into your consideration at all. You concede there have been contributions by black people to our society but you disregard them because of the actions of a minority of violent blacks today.
Prior to the 1930's, blacks were on average as successful as whites and even exceeded (as well as dropped below) them in some areas. This was even with segregation and legalized racism being commonplace in certain parts of the country. In the 1930's Democrats conspired to exploit blacks just as they do with all minority groups and since then blacks have been on a steady decline. The Democrat Party at the time was entirely white, by the way, and continues to be majority white even up to today.
Name one country that "became better" by having more Irish? Italians? Germans? Russians? How are you even defining "better"? You still won't answer that question, or any of my other questions.
So do you support removing anyone who doesn't benefit society, or just black people? What about Jews? Latinos? Do you support removing individuals or just racial groups? How do you measure benefit to society? Do you only consider scientific contribution, or do you include food, music, art and culture? Is anyone who doesn't contribute worthy of hatred and expulsion? What about the weak, disabled and disadvantaged?
Let me repeat, racial hatred is stupid and irrational. I could almost certainly make the same argument that some group that you're a member of isn't "worth the hassle". You have no idea where that path leads and how it would inevitably bite you in the back.
an average black person contributes net 500k to 750k negative over his lifetime. a Latino contributes something like 300k negative. only Asians and whites are net positive contributors. blacks commit 80% of interracial crimes and rapes, Latino takes the other almost 10%. blacks contributed nothing valuable in arts, culture and muh food. name one country that became better by having more blacks.
You didn't answer any of my questions.
blacks as a group contributed nothing of value to the the world, what little contributions some talented individuals did were not worth the over represented violence, crimes and welfare usage the rest of the race committed.
You still aren't answering any of my questions.
You seem to think the value of a person is directly related to their net-income over a lifetime... an absolutely terrible metric that would put movie stars and politicians near the top of the value pyramid despite contributing the most to cultural and political corruption and decay.
As with all groups, the vast majority of crimes are committed by a relatively small percentage of the population. That doesn't seem to enter into your consideration at all. You concede there have been contributions by black people to our society but you disregard them because of the actions of a minority of violent blacks today.
Prior to the 1930's, blacks were on average as successful as whites and even exceeded (as well as dropped below) them in some areas. This was even with segregation and legalized racism being commonplace in certain parts of the country. In the 1930's Democrats conspired to exploit blacks just as they do with all minority groups and since then blacks have been on a steady decline. The Democrat Party at the time was entirely white, by the way, and continues to be majority white even up to today.
Name one country that "became better" by having more Irish? Italians? Germans? Russians? How are you even defining "better"? You still won't answer that question, or any of my other questions.
For sure jews.