I'll agree a surplus of single men is probably detrimental to society. But, rather than getting them killed perhaps the larger question should be what has happened in society to create a surplus of single men. Otherwise it will just happen again.
In this specific case, there’s terrible “cultural” shit (in the case of India, mainly), as well as poor politics, that created this situation…
It is simply not something that is likely to ever occur, in the developed world…
So, your point still stands, and you are correct, but the ChiComs and subcontinental primitives created this mess - they can sleep in it, as far as I’m concerned.
Also, notably, this situation was created due to cultural “trends” which directly resulted in fewer girls making it to adulthood, so it literally directly made women worse off…
There is literally nothing that any TRUE feminist (which discounts most middle class liberal “third wave feminists”, clearly), with even a cursory/superficial understanding of the situation, should be celebrating about this mess. Literally nothing…
Which, I suppose, shows just how out of touch these people are with material reality…
Feminist groups from the first wave wrote guides on how to exploit women's lack of financial status to saddle your partner with an impossible to pay tax bill.
Whether you agree with their aims or not, their methods have always been needlessly sadistic.
Abortion. Women want their first child to be male. Someone that can work hard to support them when they get old and won't whine and avoid work like a woman will. So they abort girls before they're born. In China, they were only allowed one child so way less girls if the first born is male.
I'll agree a surplus of single men is probably detrimental to society. But, rather than getting them killed perhaps the larger question should be what has happened in society to create a surplus of single men. Otherwise it will just happen again.
"B-but we just enjoy killing...you're an incel for wanting us to reflect on our actions."
In this specific case, there’s terrible “cultural” shit (in the case of India, mainly), as well as poor politics, that created this situation…
It is simply not something that is likely to ever occur, in the developed world…
So, your point still stands, and you are correct, but the ChiComs and subcontinental primitives created this mess - they can sleep in it, as far as I’m concerned.
Also, notably, this situation was created due to cultural “trends” which directly resulted in fewer girls making it to adulthood, so it literally directly made women worse off…
There is literally nothing that any TRUE feminist (which discounts most middle class liberal “third wave feminists”, clearly), with even a cursory/superficial understanding of the situation, should be celebrating about this mess. Literally nothing…
Which, I suppose, shows just how out of touch these people are with material reality…
Feminists are anti-male sadists first and female supremacists second.
Regarding current feminism in the West: Yes, I unironically agree with you, here.
I disagree that it was always this way, but for at least the last 30-40 years, in Western countries..?
Yes. Unfortunately so…
Ever heard of the white feather brigade you muppet
No, it has always been this way.
Feminist groups from the first wave wrote guides on how to exploit women's lack of financial status to saddle your partner with an impossible to pay tax bill.
Whether you agree with their aims or not, their methods have always been needlessly sadistic.
Abortion. Women want their first child to be male. Someone that can work hard to support them when they get old and won't whine and avoid work like a woman will. So they abort girls before they're born. In China, they were only allowed one child so way less girls if the first born is male.