I’m pro abortion because of who’s getting abortions, but someone that’s pro choice tried arguing with me the other day when I said abortion wasn’t ever a right. They said it is because of the right to bodily autonomy. I said you have two bodies in this situation so it’s hard to draw the line as to when both have the right to bodily autonomy as it’s not like we let mothers kill their babies after they pop up and there’s at least a period of time before that when it’s not any different. There’s never any coherent response to that. You know your side is fucked when you can’t actually address or discuss an issue but have to rely on metaphors and slogans indefinitely.
At least with me I can say I think plenty of abortion might be murder but I’m okay with that because of who’s doing it. Then I just point to a photo of pretty much any women’s march attendee, or ghetto welfare folks. I’m okay if they kill their babies and don’t breed in the same way you’d be okay with a warring tribe of crazy people chopping off each other’s limbs. “Great, you do that and disappear from existence. Let me know if you need help.”
I’m pro abortion because of who’s getting abortions
I disagree with this sentiment as it enables the exact degeneracy that created the cultural problem to begin with. If the only answer is to let degenerates kill their children then who will they work on to continue their legacy? Foucault was a gay pedophile who died of aids, he is also the most cited social scientist in history, he has no children, yet plenty of others' children have taken his mantle. Abortion does not guarantee degenerate children just as poverty does not guarantee generational poverty. The more we enable and bastardize truth for convenience, the more those that promote convenience win.
A breach baby is roe v wade? Show me you don’t understand basic human biology without saying it…
I’m pro abortion because of who’s getting abortions, but someone that’s pro choice tried arguing with me the other day when I said abortion wasn’t ever a right. They said it is because of the right to bodily autonomy. I said you have two bodies in this situation so it’s hard to draw the line as to when both have the right to bodily autonomy as it’s not like we let mothers kill their babies after they pop up and there’s at least a period of time before that when it’s not any different. There’s never any coherent response to that. You know your side is fucked when you can’t actually address or discuss an issue but have to rely on metaphors and slogans indefinitely.
At least with me I can say I think plenty of abortion might be murder but I’m okay with that because of who’s doing it. Then I just point to a photo of pretty much any women’s march attendee, or ghetto welfare folks. I’m okay if they kill their babies and don’t breed in the same way you’d be okay with a warring tribe of crazy people chopping off each other’s limbs. “Great, you do that and disappear from existence. Let me know if you need help.”
I disagree with this sentiment as it enables the exact degeneracy that created the cultural problem to begin with. If the only answer is to let degenerates kill their children then who will they work on to continue their legacy? Foucault was a gay pedophile who died of aids, he is also the most cited social scientist in history, he has no children, yet plenty of others' children have taken his mantle. Abortion does not guarantee degenerate children just as poverty does not guarantee generational poverty. The more we enable and bastardize truth for convenience, the more those that promote convenience win.
Exactly, the (((subversive))) media today is enough to pervert the minds of children even of the most loving and reactionary of parents.