The problem with unions are those that typically organize a union are almost never actually interested in working for the employees to get a more fair deal. They then also end up protecting bad employees making firing an awful employee difficult and expensive. Making a union a leach both on the employees and the company that employees them. If you could guarantee that union leadership was ran by moral people chances are things would be fine, strikes would be rare, and pay/ working conditions would be fair. Unfortunately you can’t guarantee it and it also can create an attitude of “my union rep will get me out of doing something” despite it being in the contract.
A skilled employees best option if they aren’t happy with their pay or working condition is to bring it up with management, and if nothing is done do the difficult task of finding new employment.
Exactly, unions are essentially miniature forms of government where the fuckers who run the unions are always taking their "share" off the top. They only do things to "benefit" the union if it gets THEM more money. Unions have no check on their power, no alternative branch that can audit them when they become big and lazy like corporations and governments do. Unions just add more fucking red tape to an already shitty situation.
Like if the union was organized exclusively by people working at the place unionizing it has a better chance of not being corrupt in the short term. But eventually someone is going to win a rep election based on popularity and be one of the most corrupt people there. It’s something that should be dissolved frequently. But if the company is so badly managed that the only way for fair wages and safe working conditions can be guaranteed by the entire staff threatening to quit there are some serious other problems
The problem with unions are those that typically organize a union are almost never actually interested in working for the employees to get a more fair deal. They then also end up protecting bad employees making firing an awful employee difficult and expensive. Making a union a leach both on the employees and the company that employees them. If you could guarantee that union leadership was ran by moral people chances are things would be fine, strikes would be rare, and pay/ working conditions would be fair. Unfortunately you can’t guarantee it and it also can create an attitude of “my union rep will get me out of doing something” despite it being in the contract.
A skilled employees best option if they aren’t happy with their pay or working condition is to bring it up with management, and if nothing is done do the difficult task of finding new employment.
Exactly, unions are essentially miniature forms of government where the fuckers who run the unions are always taking their "share" off the top. They only do things to "benefit" the union if it gets THEM more money. Unions have no check on their power, no alternative branch that can audit them when they become big and lazy like corporations and governments do. Unions just add more fucking red tape to an already shitty situation.
Like if the union was organized exclusively by people working at the place unionizing it has a better chance of not being corrupt in the short term. But eventually someone is going to win a rep election based on popularity and be one of the most corrupt people there. It’s something that should be dissolved frequently. But if the company is so badly managed that the only way for fair wages and safe working conditions can be guaranteed by the entire staff threatening to quit there are some serious other problems