What they've done is attack men based on the worst men's behaviors, but then they start replacing male abuse with the female version of what's basically the same abuse.
The difference is that when men are abusive you at least now it's bad.
When women are abusive they manage to convince everything their abuse "is a good thing".
Yep. Bad men rule by physical force. Bad women rule by manipulation.
Also compounding this is the push for "equity" -- women are less likely to be good leaders. It doesn't mean it's impossible, it just means the more we push it towards 50/50 the more leadership positions are being occupied by vapid, petty tyrants without any leadership qualities at all.
One of the most visible female "leaders" in the current zeitgeist is CDC Director Walensky. Just try to imagine her taking responsibility for anything - it's impossible because she's proven herself incapable.
What they've done is attack men based on the worst men's behaviors, but then they start replacing male abuse with the female version of what's basically the same abuse.
The difference is that when men are abusive you at least now it's bad.
When women are abusive they manage to convince everything their abuse "is a good thing".
Yep. Bad men rule by physical force. Bad women rule by manipulation.
Also compounding this is the push for "equity" -- women are less likely to be good leaders. It doesn't mean it's impossible, it just means the more we push it towards 50/50 the more leadership positions are being occupied by vapid, petty tyrants without any leadership qualities at all.
One of the most visible female "leaders" in the current zeitgeist is CDC Director Walensky. Just try to imagine her taking responsibility for anything - it's impossible because she's proven herself incapable.