It's beyond reddit moderators, though. It's like this everywhere. I was banned on my established account that I had since 2015. I've since deleted it, though. I don't have a reddit account anymore.
When I said audience, I meant winning over the audience, not the pre-existing opinions of the audience.
It's beyond reddit moderators, though. It's like this everywhere. I was banned on my established account that I had since 2015. I've since deleted it, though. I don't have a reddit account anymore.
And to confirm, it was KiA2? Disappointing. Always thought I did a good job of distinguishing bad actors and those who at least have something positive to contribute. Unless you were going full tard on the sub, but that would be out of character.
When I said audience, I meant winning over the audience, not the pre-existing opinions of the audience.
Then you would certainly win, because it's easier to win over one out of 99% than one out of 1%. That is what I always found strange about the Intelligence Squared debates: if you favor the more popular view, you are at a disadvantage. Maybe that's good though.
Yes. I had a temp ban on half-KiA once but was unbanned at the time of my account deletion. It's kind of ironic that I was perma'd on KiA2 not half-KiA, but that's mostly due to me hardly being active on half-KiA.
Then you would certainly win, because it's easier to win over one out of 99% than one out of 1%.
I suppose the math checks out, but that's not the only thing in play. In open debates, we would be free to talk about what's best for white people and what would actually work to preserve our future. Instead, right-liberal "anti-idpol" frauds get trotted out to "defend" white people from attacks from POC idpol. They then equivocate the two. The strategy can work rhetorically when the alternative view point is POC idpol.
However, pointing out that the "anti-idpol" are supportive of Jewish idpol, presumably because that's a demographic whose future they actually want to preserve, and emphasizing that, even if for argument's sake the anti-idpol faction were operating in good faith, they aren't actually convincing Jews, blacks, etc. to abandon idpol. Even worse, they don't acknowledge how ineffective they have been.
I should probably take a step back here and point out that I don't think everyone who is an "anti-idpol" Zionist is some sort of scheming subverter. The high-agency people who drive a lot of discussion probably know what they are doing and are actively malicious. Random people just tend to repeat talking points without thinking about the implications.
Yes. I had a temp ban on half-KiA once but was unbanned at the time of my account deletion. It's kind of ironic that I was perma'd on KiA2 not half-KiA, but that's mostly due to me hardly being active on half-KiA.
That is so weird. Must have been some sort of oversight. We never permabanned long-term users, only in exceptional circumstances. There was a case where a user with something like 10 earlier comments was permabanned, and when we noticed - he was unbanned with 'time served'.
Glad I don't have to do that anymore.
In open debates, we would be free to talk about what's best for white people and what would actually work to preserve our future.
I question why it is a good thing to debate what is 'good for white people'. In the rest of the world, no one goes around thinking like that. There are no Congolese thinking about 'what is good for black people', or Middle Easterenrs thinking 'what is good for brown people', nor Japanese etc.
However, pointing out that the "anti-idpol" are supportive of Jewish idpol, presumably because that's a demographic whose future they actually want to preserve,
Explain how my position leads to the preservation of Jews and not whites.
good faith, they aren't actually convincing Jews, blacks, etc. to abandon idpol. Even worse, they don't acknowledge how ineffective they have been.
They have had successes. But if success means convincing the other side to abandon this tactic, that probably is not going to happen unless it becomes radioactive.
I should probably take a step back here and point out that I don't think everyone who is an "anti-idpol" Zionist is some sort of scheming subverter. The high-agency people who drive a lot of discussion probably know what they are doing and are actively malicious. Random people just tend to repeat talking points without thinking about the implications.
I don't really care anymore about being banned from subreddit. Reddit is so goddamn awful anymore.
question why it is a good thing to debate what is 'good for white people'. In the rest of the world, no one goes around thinking like that. There are no Congolese thinking about 'what is good for black people', or Middle Easterenrs thinking 'what is good for brown people', nor Japanese etc.
You can sub in "white Americans" if that helps it make sense. Europe is part of it, but it's up to them if they want to go pan-European or not.
Explain how my position leads to the preservation of Jews and not whites.
They end up with an ethnostate dedicated to preserving them. We keep our governments that we have now, that are dedicated to replacing us.
They have had successes.
As in non-zero? Sure. But they're fucking deluded. You had people think Blexit was an actual thing FFS. They don't even criticize Jewish idpol. They might feud with organizations that practice it (especially the ADL), but they don't condemn Jewish idpol itself.
It's beyond reddit moderators, though. It's like this everywhere. I was banned on my established account that I had since 2015. I've since deleted it, though. I don't have a reddit account anymore.
When I said audience, I meant winning over the audience, not the pre-existing opinions of the audience.
And to confirm, it was KiA2? Disappointing. Always thought I did a good job of distinguishing bad actors and those who at least have something positive to contribute. Unless you were going full tard on the sub, but that would be out of character.
Then you would certainly win, because it's easier to win over one out of 99% than one out of 1%. That is what I always found strange about the Intelligence Squared debates: if you favor the more popular view, you are at a disadvantage. Maybe that's good though.
Yes. I had a temp ban on half-KiA once but was unbanned at the time of my account deletion. It's kind of ironic that I was perma'd on KiA2 not half-KiA, but that's mostly due to me hardly being active on half-KiA.
I suppose the math checks out, but that's not the only thing in play. In open debates, we would be free to talk about what's best for white people and what would actually work to preserve our future. Instead, right-liberal "anti-idpol" frauds get trotted out to "defend" white people from attacks from POC idpol. They then equivocate the two. The strategy can work rhetorically when the alternative view point is POC idpol.
However, pointing out that the "anti-idpol" are supportive of Jewish idpol, presumably because that's a demographic whose future they actually want to preserve, and emphasizing that, even if for argument's sake the anti-idpol faction were operating in good faith, they aren't actually convincing Jews, blacks, etc. to abandon idpol. Even worse, they don't acknowledge how ineffective they have been.
I should probably take a step back here and point out that I don't think everyone who is an "anti-idpol" Zionist is some sort of scheming subverter. The high-agency people who drive a lot of discussion probably know what they are doing and are actively malicious. Random people just tend to repeat talking points without thinking about the implications.
That is so weird. Must have been some sort of oversight. We never permabanned long-term users, only in exceptional circumstances. There was a case where a user with something like 10 earlier comments was permabanned, and when we noticed - he was unbanned with 'time served'.
Glad I don't have to do that anymore.
I question why it is a good thing to debate what is 'good for white people'. In the rest of the world, no one goes around thinking like that. There are no Congolese thinking about 'what is good for black people', or Middle Easterenrs thinking 'what is good for brown people', nor Japanese etc.
Explain how my position leads to the preservation of Jews and not whites.
They have had successes. But if success means convincing the other side to abandon this tactic, that probably is not going to happen unless it becomes radioactive.
Generally true, yes.
I don't really care anymore about being banned from subreddit. Reddit is so goddamn awful anymore.
You can sub in "white Americans" if that helps it make sense. Europe is part of it, but it's up to them if they want to go pan-European or not.
They end up with an ethnostate dedicated to preserving them. We keep our governments that we have now, that are dedicated to replacing us.
As in non-zero? Sure. But they're fucking deluded. You had people think Blexit was an actual thing FFS. They don't even criticize Jewish idpol. They might feud with organizations that practice it (especially the ADL), but they don't condemn Jewish idpol itself.