The ADL is an international Jewish idpol organization. Yes, they tend to align with Dems in the US because the ADL has a more left-wing disposition, but it's absurd to just say they are an arm of the Dems. Also, Dubya was quite chummy with their then director.
Additionally, President George W. Bush appointed Foxman to serve on the Honorary Delegation to accompany him to Jerusalem for the celebration of the 60th anniversary of Israel in May 2008.
Yes, they tend to align with Dems in the US because the ADL has a more left-wing disposition, but it's absurd to just say they are an arm of the Dems. Also, Dubya was quite chummy with their then director.
It's gone very far downhill since Foxman left. Right now, it has nothing at all to do with defending the interests of Jews, when these are unjustly damaged.
So the "good old days" of the ADL were back when it was normalizing the "Nation of Immigrants" retcon of American history that was used to speed us toward the demographic cliff? Ok...
The ADL has merely become more partisan, like many other things.
Right now, it has nothing at all to do with defending the interests of Jews
Just the other day I cited their Zionist position and moral defense of Israel's policies of maintaining its Jewish majority.
So the "good old days" of the ADL were back when it was normalizing the "Nation of Immigrants" retcon of American history that was used to speed us toward the demographic cliff? Ok...
Where did the Mayflower come from?
Just the other day I cited their Zionist position and moral defense of Israel's policies of maintaining its Jewish majority.
Which does nothing to defend the interests of the Jews, which are not identical with those of Israel.
Dear God, you're actually going to defend this "Nation of Immigrants" garbage. This particular psyop plays on America's history as a European colony. It's meant to say that accepting immigrants is some sort of proud American tradition therefore a "good American patriot" would support huge amounts of immigration.
I would also add that even if such immigration didn't exist, you could still use their own traditionalist argument against them, for example, by pointing out that whites are America's traditional majority demographic so if you're all about traditions, why are they opposed to maintaining the traditional demographic balance?
This is the kind of shit I'm talking about where the liberals would get wrecked if they didn't censor us. They get wrecked in their own frame when relevant facts are allowed into the debate. It's even worse for them when I enter my own frame, which is that it's bad for white people to get demographically engulfed by immigrants.
The ADL is an international Jewish idpol organization. Yes, they tend to align with Dems in the US because the ADL has a more left-wing disposition, but it's absurd to just say they are an arm of the Dems. Also, Dubya was quite chummy with their then director.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Foxman
And when they are working the Dems, the projects can be rather...interesting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Nation_of_Immigrants
Even that wasn't strictly partisan since Rubio jumped in for the re-release.
It's gone very far downhill since Foxman left. Right now, it has nothing at all to do with defending the interests of Jews, when these are unjustly damaged.
So the "good old days" of the ADL were back when it was normalizing the "Nation of Immigrants" retcon of American history that was used to speed us toward the demographic cliff? Ok...
The ADL has merely become more partisan, like many other things.
Just the other day I cited their Zionist position and moral defense of Israel's policies of maintaining its Jewish majority.
Where did the Mayflower come from?
Which does nothing to defend the interests of the Jews, which are not identical with those of Israel.
Dear God, you're actually going to defend this "Nation of Immigrants" garbage. This particular psyop plays on America's history as a European colony. It's meant to say that accepting immigrants is some sort of proud American tradition therefore a "good American patriot" would support huge amounts of immigration.
The retcon comes in the form of a lie by omission. The actual American tradition WRT immigration looks more like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790
I would also add that even if such immigration didn't exist, you could still use their own traditionalist argument against them, for example, by pointing out that whites are America's traditional majority demographic so if you're all about traditions, why are they opposed to maintaining the traditional demographic balance?
This is the kind of shit I'm talking about where the liberals would get wrecked if they didn't censor us. They get wrecked in their own frame when relevant facts are allowed into the debate. It's even worse for them when I enter my own frame, which is that it's bad for white people to get demographically engulfed by immigrants.