It is pragmatic to nominate the guy who supercharges Democrat turnout and makes the election close enough to ensure that fraud decides it in favor of the Democrats?
Pragmatic to nominate the guy who thinks OWS is his best achievement?
Pragmatic to nominate the guy who makes Jared Kushner his prime minister?
I didn't expect Trump to fix everything or anything crazy like that, I merely expected him to not leave us in a worse position when he left than when he came in.
He gave us three okish Supreme court justices and a good economy in 2017-2019 with no new wars.
He also gave us Operation Warpspeed, covid lockdowns, Jared Kushner as his prime minister, the platinum plan for Blacks and some of the worst staffing decisions I had the misfortune of seeing in my life with people like Barr, Pompeo and Meadows.
We lost the House in 2018 and then both the Senate and the Presidency in 2020.
Trump is not the electoral juggernaut people like you keep overestimating him to be.
I think the negatives of Trump greatly outweigh the positives.
It is insanity to argue that Trump is still the best candidate in 2024.
He's the most likely candidate to beat any Democrat contender. Every poll of GOP supporters shows that he is by far the most popular Presidential candidate for 24. Maybe he supercharges Dem turnout, maybe he doesn't. Given how badly they've fucked up the past couple of years, my bet is not. But we know that he will supercharge GOP turnout.
Trump never implemented a single COVID lockdown. Stop putting that shit on his door. You know it's not true: You're lying.
He gave us the Supreme Court that struck down Roe v Wade and enshrined the biggest reassertion of the Second Amendment since the 1940s. Once again, you seem determined to be upset that they don't get it right 100% of the time and refuse to acknowledge that it's significantly better than it was.
Trump was never in a position to do anything about voter fraud because the President doesn't administrate the electoral practices of every separate state and county in the country. The people who can make those decisions apparently needed to see just how badly the system could be abused before they were willing to do something about it. And now, a number of states that returned fraudulent results in 2020 have made huge strides towards strengthening the integrity of their elections. Not only will that help with the Presidential election, but also return more accurate results for the House and the Senate, because we know the Dems have been rigging those for decades as well.
When faced with a horde of swamp monsters chomping at the bit to make him fail, Trump did his best to try and pick people he thought he could trust. He thought he could trust Kushner because he was family. He was wrong, but I'd like to see anyone who runs headlong into Hell correctly identify the six wrongfully condemned souls out of a legion of demons.
This is what is called a cult of personality around one man.
I merely layed out the positives and negatives of a Trump run in 2024 and in response you wrote a "welovetrump.com" esque puff piece that frames everything that happened in the last few years into a false narrative where Trump is not responsible at all for any of his mistakes.
Talking to you about the negatives of Trump 2024 is pointless.
All I did was refute most of your "negatives," because most of what you're accusing Trump of doing wrong wasn't his fault and you know it.
You are a child throwing a temper tantrum because you didn't get 100% of what you wanted and 50% isn't good enough for you. You are a shining example of the mentality that makes the right so addicted to losing.
It is pragmatic to nominate the guy who supercharges Democrat turnout and makes the election close enough to ensure that fraud decides it in favor of the Democrats?
Pragmatic to nominate the guy who thinks OWS is his best achievement?
Pragmatic to nominate the guy who makes Jared Kushner his prime minister?
I didn't expect Trump to fix everything or anything crazy like that, I merely expected him to not leave us in a worse position when he left than when he came in.
He gave us three okish Supreme court justices and a good economy in 2017-2019 with no new wars.
He also gave us Operation Warpspeed, covid lockdowns, Jared Kushner as his prime minister, the platinum plan for Blacks and some of the worst staffing decisions I had the misfortune of seeing in my life with people like Barr, Pompeo and Meadows.
We lost the House in 2018 and then both the Senate and the Presidency in 2020.
Trump is not the electoral juggernaut people like you keep overestimating him to be.
I think the negatives of Trump greatly outweigh the positives.
It is insanity to argue that Trump is still the best candidate in 2024.
He's the most likely candidate to beat any Democrat contender. Every poll of GOP supporters shows that he is by far the most popular Presidential candidate for 24. Maybe he supercharges Dem turnout, maybe he doesn't. Given how badly they've fucked up the past couple of years, my bet is not. But we know that he will supercharge GOP turnout.
Trump never implemented a single COVID lockdown. Stop putting that shit on his door. You know it's not true: You're lying.
He gave us the Supreme Court that struck down Roe v Wade and enshrined the biggest reassertion of the Second Amendment since the 1940s. Once again, you seem determined to be upset that they don't get it right 100% of the time and refuse to acknowledge that it's significantly better than it was.
Trump was never in a position to do anything about voter fraud because the President doesn't administrate the electoral practices of every separate state and county in the country. The people who can make those decisions apparently needed to see just how badly the system could be abused before they were willing to do something about it. And now, a number of states that returned fraudulent results in 2020 have made huge strides towards strengthening the integrity of their elections. Not only will that help with the Presidential election, but also return more accurate results for the House and the Senate, because we know the Dems have been rigging those for decades as well.
When faced with a horde of swamp monsters chomping at the bit to make him fail, Trump did his best to try and pick people he thought he could trust. He thought he could trust Kushner because he was family. He was wrong, but I'd like to see anyone who runs headlong into Hell correctly identify the six wrongfully condemned souls out of a legion of demons.
This is what is called a cult of personality around one man.
I merely layed out the positives and negatives of a Trump run in 2024 and in response you wrote a "welovetrump.com" esque puff piece that frames everything that happened in the last few years into a false narrative where Trump is not responsible at all for any of his mistakes.
Talking to you about the negatives of Trump 2024 is pointless.
Have a good day!
All I did was refute most of your "negatives," because most of what you're accusing Trump of doing wrong wasn't his fault and you know it.
You are a child throwing a temper tantrum because you didn't get 100% of what you wanted and 50% isn't good enough for you. You are a shining example of the mentality that makes the right so addicted to losing.