Trading for basic necessities should fall under "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness." I might not say it's a definite "right," but it's one of those things that once you violate that trust, all too many laws go down the toilet, because further enforcing them means civil war.
Do you want to be the one to enforce preventing someone from obtaining necessities without the most severe of causes?
Does it matter for the question whether it is a right?
Trading for basic necessities should fall under "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness." I might not say it's a definite "right," but it's one of those things that once you violate that trust, all too many laws go down the toilet, because further enforcing them means civil war.