BTW, it appears that this girl may have been coerced by GirlsDoPorn into doing porn. Still, this is rather unseemly. I don't believe for a moment that such a con of a company cares about her, or anyone.
BTW, it appears that this girl may have been coerced by GirlsDoPorn into doing porn.
Nobody "coerced" shit. She did porn FOR MONEY. 99% of the girls who did girlsdoporn had 0 issues. The company used false advertisement to attract girls, but once the girls responded, they were told it was actually a porn solicitation and offered a lot of money. So any girls who accepted, consented, they were not "coerced".
A handful (out of many hundreds) made rape allegations. None of the filmed scenes were rapes. Instead, a few girls said they were raped off camera. I find this highly doubtful. It's far more likely that the girls simply regretted doing porn. It is well known, thanks to studies, that a few percent of girls are willing to make false rape allegations to take revenge on men who they feel have wronged them.
How do you get coerced into doing pornography for a site literally called girlsdoporn.com?
Don’t get me wrong, I would burn down the pornography industry in a day if I could, but if you don’t walk into that company expecting anything other than sexual activity being your job, then you’ve certainly hit the bottom of the barrel in deductive reasoning.
Something very fishy is going on. Here is another instance of Celsius (or Forbes, or someone) false DMCA'ing information about Jessica Khater.
https://twitter.com/cryptocoitas/status/1245161538727686144
So what was this? Nothing more than a screenshot of Forbes 30 Under 30.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220619103518/https://twitter.com/cryptocoitas/status/1245161538727686144
BTW, it appears that this girl may have been coerced by GirlsDoPorn into doing porn. Still, this is rather unseemly. I don't believe for a moment that such a con of a company cares about her, or anyone.
Nobody "coerced" shit. She did porn FOR MONEY. 99% of the girls who did girlsdoporn had 0 issues. The company used false advertisement to attract girls, but once the girls responded, they were told it was actually a porn solicitation and offered a lot of money. So any girls who accepted, consented, they were not "coerced".
A handful (out of many hundreds) made rape allegations. None of the filmed scenes were rapes. Instead, a few girls said they were raped off camera. I find this highly doubtful. It's far more likely that the girls simply regretted doing porn. It is well known, thanks to studies, that a few percent of girls are willing to make false rape allegations to take revenge on men who they feel have wronged them.
How do you get coerced into doing pornography for a site literally called girlsdoporn.com?
Don’t get me wrong, I would burn down the pornography industry in a day if I could, but if you don’t walk into that company expecting anything other than sexual activity being your job, then you’ve certainly hit the bottom of the barrel in deductive reasoning.
Well, they don't advertise themselves as "girlsdoporn.com". The porn companies never do. It's a shady industry.