I always figured they could go do a civil contract with a lawyer.
They specifically rejected civil unions, because it was never about them associating, or even getting the benefits of being married without providing the benefits of a marriage to society.
It was always about power. They wanted to force people who disagreed to call it a marriage. They wanted people who objected to bake the cake, officiate the ceremony, file the paperwork.
SCOTUS making stuff up and an almost century long campaign of a highly organized elite gay minority going back to the International Congress for Sexual Reform on a Scientific Basis in the 1920s.
How did they win? They claimed a right to associate? I always figured they could go do a civil contract with a lawyer.
They specifically rejected civil unions, because it was never about them associating, or even getting the benefits of being married without providing the benefits of a marriage to society.
It was always about power. They wanted to force people who disagreed to call it a marriage. They wanted people who objected to bake the cake, officiate the ceremony, file the paperwork.
SCOTUS making stuff up and an almost century long campaign of a highly organized elite gay minority going back to the International Congress for Sexual Reform on a Scientific Basis in the 1920s.