There is at least some camp that holds their stance, and it makes sense as "something bad happening to you doesn't justify murder." Its consistent with their ideology, even if its cold and cruel.
But even for many of them, I think they can realize that they will have to compromise to pass any bans at all. And they'd say: saving 99% is better than saving 0%. That's what I would think, even if I believed it was murder in all cases.
And I'd agree and its likely most do as well. Just giving some credence to the prolifers who don't and that their stance does make sense even if I disagree.
I think nearly everyone.
Now if only hardcore on the other side were willing to compromise on "abortion a minute before birth".
There is at least some camp that holds their stance, and it makes sense as "something bad happening to you doesn't justify murder." Its consistent with their ideology, even if its cold and cruel.
But even for many of them, I think they can realize that they will have to compromise to pass any bans at all. And they'd say: saving 99% is better than saving 0%. That's what I would think, even if I believed it was murder in all cases.
And I'd agree and its likely most do as well. Just giving some credence to the prolifers who don't and that their stance does make sense even if I disagree.