Honestly, if there was a place that could actually successfully overthrow a Leftist government in western Europe, it would be one of the smaller nations, like Netherlands, Portugal, or Denmark.
Barring Sri Lanka like situations, that's not going to happen. These small nations have a high degree of 'social trust', which means that a lot of people are actually convinced that the government is looking out for their interests. No matter how much evidence to the contrary emerges, it's just Murray Gellmanned away.
France could do it, but not without their traditional level of bloodshed
Most French Revolutions have been relatively peaceful. 1830, 1848, 1870.
Being that Netherlands, Portugal, & Denmark are so small, they could genuinely hold their own governments accountable, and push out moderate socialists, with die-hard nationalists, the same way some American counties and states do.
It is impossible. They've enacted 10,000 treaties codifying all their preferences into law. In case of a nationalist takeover, you'd have to abrogate these treaties, and then the larger countries would strangle you.
No, 'world revolution' in the communist phrase is the only possibility.
But a Poland, Hungary, Netherlands, Austrian, AMERICAN coalition is rather absurdly powerful.
The problem is that 4/5 of the American - as well as of the others except P&H - would be fighting for the enemy. Unsuccessful revolutions often have something in common: the failure to purge the bureaucracy, military etc. of elements attempting to bring back the ancien regime.
The Fabians and Europhiles might have an iron grip on institutions, but their real power over their populations is genuinely diminishing.
Yes and no, but not quickly enough. Their ability to defraud their populations is decreasing, but not their ability to coerce. We'll be at civilization's end before they can be overthrown.
These small nations have a high degree of 'social trust', which means that a lot of people are actually convinced that the government is looking out for their interests.
That level of trust can be quickly erroded.
It is impossible. They've enacted 10,000 treaties codifying all their preferences into law. In case of a nationalist takeover, you'd have to abrogate these treaties, and then the larger countries would strangle you.
I've watched the law be treated as a suggestion for quite some time now. The point I made about why you need a coalition, is the response to the innevitable 'strangling'.
The problem is that 4/5 of the American - as well as of the others except P&H - would be fighting for the enemy.
As you say, it depends on the purge.
Their ability to defraud their populations is decreasing, but not their ability to coerce. We'll be at civilization's end before they can be overthrown.
Your assessment is ridiculously black-pilled when it is much the opposite situation. World communism died within 2-3 years. Napolean's continental arrangement fell in weeks. Fabianism will suffer a similar fate.
Barring Sri Lanka like situations, that's not going to happen. These small nations have a high degree of 'social trust', which means that a lot of people are actually convinced that the government is looking out for their interests. No matter how much evidence to the contrary emerges, it's just Murray Gellmanned away.
Most French Revolutions have been relatively peaceful. 1830, 1848, 1870.
It is impossible. They've enacted 10,000 treaties codifying all their preferences into law. In case of a nationalist takeover, you'd have to abrogate these treaties, and then the larger countries would strangle you.
No, 'world revolution' in the communist phrase is the only possibility.
The problem is that 4/5 of the American - as well as of the others except P&H - would be fighting for the enemy. Unsuccessful revolutions often have something in common: the failure to purge the bureaucracy, military etc. of elements attempting to bring back the ancien regime.
Yes and no, but not quickly enough. Their ability to defraud their populations is decreasing, but not their ability to coerce. We'll be at civilization's end before they can be overthrown.
That level of trust can be quickly erroded.
I've watched the law be treated as a suggestion for quite some time now. The point I made about why you need a coalition, is the response to the innevitable 'strangling'.
As you say, it depends on the purge.
Your assessment is ridiculously black-pilled when it is much the opposite situation. World communism died within 2-3 years. Napolean's continental arrangement fell in weeks. Fabianism will suffer a similar fate.