Who is the best (least bad) realistic Conservative candidate for PM?

posted 2 years ago by AntonioOfVenice 2 years ago by AntonioOfVenice +17 / -0

It seems Ben Wallace, a psycho neocon warmonger who fell for a Vovan and Lexus prank call, has bowed out of the leadership race.

So far the declared candidates are:

Liz Truss: the talentless foreign minister Liz Truss.
Rishi Sunak - a Goldman Sachs banker, globalist married to a billionaire's daughter.
Tom Tugendhat - Remainer, globalist, Bilderberg attendee.
Kemi Bedenoch - Former 'Equality' minister.

Discuss.

30 comments

30 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (30)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice [S] 3 points 2 years ago +4 / -1

We have the right to speech and self defense

Tell that to James Damore and the Missouri couple who tried to defend their home from BLM terrorists.

If you wanted to stop the British from destroying their country then you should have been alive during the aftermath of the Second World War.

I think the French Revolution did in all of Europe.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– Ahaus667 3 points 2 years ago +4 / -1

You mean the guy who successfully sued and settled with the largest corporation in the world and the couple that was pardoned despite the actions of a soros da?

Mark McCloskey, who was pardoned after pleading guilty to weapons charges, sued St Louis, the city sheriff and the state to retrieve the guns and told a court hearing on Wednesday that the pardons also entitled the couple to a refund of their fines.

“The loss of that property would certainly be a legal disqualification, impediment or other legal disadvantage, of which I have now been absolved by the governor, and therefore the state no longer has any legitimate reason to hold the property,” McCloskey said.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

You mean the guy who successfully sued and settled with the largest corporation in the world

I can't find any evidence for that.

and the couple that was pardoned despite the actions of a soros da?

So a Soros DA can screw you over. So much for your right to self-defense.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– Ahaus667 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1

You can’t find that Damore sued and settled with google?

Harmeet Dhillon, who represented the men, told Bloomberg that neither she nor the men could say anything about the situation as part of their agreement with Google. When asked by The Daily Wire why the word “settlement” was missing from news reports about the dismissal, Dhillon said “that language was negotiated between the parties and that is what I can say. And what they are permitted to say.”

So a Soros DA can screw you over. So much for your right to self-defense.

And a governor can step in and stop the infringement, it’s called checks and balances. Self responsible people pick the community they live in. My community didn’t have blm riots despite being a mixed community. The city I live adjacent too had minor riots from Detroiters and more civilians showed up the next day to clean up than the useless police and government.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice [S] 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

You can’t find that Damore sued and settled with google?

Yes, many sources claim he 'dropped' it. Certainly not an obvious victory, nor one that can be demonstrated.

And a governor can step in and stop the infringement, it’s called checks and balances

Wait, so you're actually defending that these people were dragged through the mud and had to go through hell for over a year, because - by pure coincidence - they lived in a state where the Governor was willing to pardon them?

That is stupid. What if it had been a BLM terrorist supporting guv?

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

▲ 2 ▼

– SR388-SAX 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

So a Soros DA can screw you over. So much for your right to self-defense

A single DA is a jackass, therefore nobody in the US has the right to self defense.

Such a Eurofag take.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– AntonioOfVenice [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Nowhere did I say that 'no one' has that privilege. I merely pointed out that since a DA can arbitrarily take it away, you certainly cannot say that it is a "right" for Americans.

If it were a right, it could not be taken away.

permalink parent save report block reply